×




Logistics Service Providers in Internet Supply Chains Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Logistics Service Providers in Internet Supply Chains case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Logistics Service Providers in Internet Supply Chains case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Elliot Rabinovich, A. Michael Knemeyer. The Logistics Service Providers in Internet Supply Chains (referred as “Providers Logistics” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Internet, Networking, Supply chain.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Logistics Service Providers in Internet Supply Chains Case Study


Logistics services and their providers are helping intermediaries add value to Internet supply chains in ways that are not always immediately obvious. Thus, it is not surprising that there is confusion among academics and practitioners about how best to extract value from such services and providers. Reports the results of a study of the role and value of logistics services and their providers. Reveals that Internet sellers establish relationships with logistics service providers in order to extract value from the providers' network of logistical resources and better fill their customers' orders. Internet sellers establish these relationships to lower the costs they would incur if they attempted to carry out the logistics services internally. They also seek such providers in order to access strong networks that bundle many complementary logistics services among Internet sellers, their customers, and their vendors.


Case Authors : Elliot Rabinovich, A. Michael Knemeyer

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Internet, Networking, Supply chain




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Logistics Service Providers in Internet Supply Chains Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010846) -10010846 - -
Year 1 3458408 -6552438 3458408 0.9434 3262649
Year 2 3959611 -2592827 7418019 0.89 3524040
Year 3 3940718 1347891 11358737 0.8396 3308703
Year 4 3230020 4577911 14588757 0.7921 2558478
TOTAL 14588757 12653870




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2643024

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Providers Logistics have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Providers Logistics shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Logistics Service Providers in Internet Supply Chains

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Providers Logistics often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Providers Logistics needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010846) -10010846 - -
Year 1 3458408 -6552438 3458408 0.8696 3007311
Year 2 3959611 -2592827 7418019 0.7561 2994035
Year 3 3940718 1347891 11358737 0.6575 2591086
Year 4 3230020 4577911 14588757 0.5718 1846774
TOTAL 10439207


The Net NPV after 4 years is 428361

(10439207 - 10010846 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010846) -10010846 - -
Year 1 3458408 -6552438 3458408 0.8333 2882007
Year 2 3959611 -2592827 7418019 0.6944 2749730
Year 3 3940718 1347891 11358737 0.5787 2280508
Year 4 3230020 4577911 14588757 0.4823 1557687
TOTAL 9469932


The Net NPV after 4 years is -540914

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9469932 - 10010846 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Providers Logistics to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Providers Logistics has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Providers Logistics can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Providers Logistics, then the stock price of the Providers Logistics should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Providers Logistics should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Logistics Service Providers in Internet Supply Chains

References & Further Readings

Elliot Rabinovich, A. Michael Knemeyer (2018), "Logistics Service Providers in Internet Supply Chains Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Futura SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Danone SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Bank Mega SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


WABCO India SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Celanese SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


BHP Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Caterpillar SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


Grindrod Shipping SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


Graphic Packaging SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging