×




Prodigy Network: Democratizing Real Estate Design and Financing Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Prodigy Network: Democratizing Real Estate Design and Financing case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Prodigy Network: Democratizing Real Estate Design and Financing case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Karim R. Lakhani, Katja Hutter, Greta Friar. The Prodigy Network: Democratizing Real Estate Design and Financing (referred as “Crowdfunding Nino” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Design, Disruptive innovation, Financial analysis, IT, Venture capital.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Prodigy Network: Democratizing Real Estate Design and Financing Case Study


This case follows Rodrigo Nino, founder and CEO of commercial real estate development company Prodigy Network, as he develops an equity-based crowdfunding model for small investors to access commercial real estate in Colombia, then tries out the model in the U.S. U.S. regulations, starting with the Securities Act of 1933, effectively barred sponsors from soliciting small investors for large commercial real estate. However, the JOBS Act of 2013 loosened U.S. restrictions on equity crowdfunding. Nino believes that crowdfunding will democratize real estate development by providing a new asset class for small investors, revolutionizing the industry. The case also follows Nino's development of an online platform to crowdsource design for his crowdfunded buildings, maximizing shared value throughout the development process. Nino faces many challenges as he attempts to crowdfund an extended stay hotel in Manhattan, New York. For example, crowdfunded real estate faces resistance from industry leaders, especially in regards to the concern of fraud, and SEC regulations on crowdfunding remain undetermined at the time of the case.


Case Authors : Karim R. Lakhani, Katja Hutter, Greta Friar

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Design, Disruptive innovation, Financial analysis, IT, Venture capital




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Prodigy Network: Democratizing Real Estate Design and Financing Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012595) -10012595 - -
Year 1 3452681 -6559914 3452681 0.9434 3257246
Year 2 3961638 -2598276 7414319 0.89 3525844
Year 3 3941689 1343413 11356008 0.8396 3309518
Year 4 3235203 4578616 14591211 0.7921 2562584
TOTAL 14591211 12655192




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2642597

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Crowdfunding Nino shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Crowdfunding Nino have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Prodigy Network: Democratizing Real Estate Design and Financing

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Crowdfunding Nino often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Crowdfunding Nino needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012595) -10012595 - -
Year 1 3452681 -6559914 3452681 0.8696 3002331
Year 2 3961638 -2598276 7414319 0.7561 2995567
Year 3 3941689 1343413 11356008 0.6575 2591725
Year 4 3235203 4578616 14591211 0.5718 1849738
TOTAL 10439361


The Net NPV after 4 years is 426766

(10439361 - 10012595 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012595) -10012595 - -
Year 1 3452681 -6559914 3452681 0.8333 2877234
Year 2 3961638 -2598276 7414319 0.6944 2751138
Year 3 3941689 1343413 11356008 0.5787 2281070
Year 4 3235203 4578616 14591211 0.4823 1560187
TOTAL 9469628


The Net NPV after 4 years is -542967

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9469628 - 10012595 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Crowdfunding Nino to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Crowdfunding Nino has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Crowdfunding Nino can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Crowdfunding Nino, then the stock price of the Crowdfunding Nino should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Crowdfunding Nino should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Prodigy Network: Democratizing Real Estate Design and Financing

References & Further Readings

Karim R. Lakhani, Katja Hutter, Greta Friar (2018), "Prodigy Network: Democratizing Real Estate Design and Financing Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Good Com Asset SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Jiangsu Canlon Building SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


UE Furniture SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Furniture & Fixtures


Zhejiang Baida SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Aluminium Malaysia SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


AXA SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Life)


Zhong An Real Estate SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Taisho Pharma Ind SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Discovery Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Accident & Health)