×




The Global Software Industry in 2007 Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for The Global Software Industry in 2007 case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The Global Software Industry in 2007 case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Minyi Huang, Ali Farhoomand. The The Global Software Industry in 2007 (referred as “Software 2007” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Technology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of The Global Software Industry in 2007 Case Study


This research note provides a snapshot of the global software industry as it undergoes a major transition in 2007. McKinsey's annual survey shows that software's share of the IT budget in 2007 is around 31.3%-up from 29.6% in 2006-and is expected to reach 36% in 2009. Internal and external funding have provided an unparalleled fertile ground for software innovation. Software development has become commodities and customer-driven, and is evolving to wards services. These service-oriented architectures allow users to focus on business logic and functions rather than the underlying IT infrastructure. New business models, like software-as-a-service, have given customers the option to pay based on their actual use of software rather than facing the high initial costs and technical complexity of buying and installing software. Also, with Web 2.0 applications, the web has become a platform for people to share and socialize. Along with off shoring and open source, all these changes are challenging the traditional licensing model of the software industry.


Case Authors : Minyi Huang, Ali Farhoomand

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Technology




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for The Global Software Industry in 2007 Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018728) -10018728 - -
Year 1 3470762 -6547966 3470762 0.9434 3274304
Year 2 3964658 -2583308 7435420 0.89 3528532
Year 3 3940502 1357194 11375922 0.8396 3308521
Year 4 3242634 4599828 14618556 0.7921 2568470
TOTAL 14618556 12679827




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2661099

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Software 2007 shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Software 2007 have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of The Global Software Industry in 2007

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Software 2007 often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Software 2007 needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018728) -10018728 - -
Year 1 3470762 -6547966 3470762 0.8696 3018054
Year 2 3964658 -2583308 7435420 0.7561 2997851
Year 3 3940502 1357194 11375922 0.6575 2590944
Year 4 3242634 4599828 14618556 0.5718 1853987
TOTAL 10460835


The Net NPV after 4 years is 442107

(10460835 - 10018728 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018728) -10018728 - -
Year 1 3470762 -6547966 3470762 0.8333 2892302
Year 2 3964658 -2583308 7435420 0.6944 2753235
Year 3 3940502 1357194 11375922 0.5787 2280383
Year 4 3242634 4599828 14618556 0.4823 1563770
TOTAL 9489690


The Net NPV after 4 years is -529038

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9489690 - 10018728 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Software 2007 to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Software 2007 has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Software 2007 can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Software 2007, then the stock price of the Software 2007 should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Software 2007 should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of The Global Software Industry in 2007

References & Further Readings

Minyi Huang, Ali Farhoomand (2018), "The Global Software Industry in 2007 Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Centennial Mining SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


JAKKS Pacific SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products


Indigo Star SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Shanghai Industrial Dev SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Spir Communication SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Printing & Publishing


Chimera Investment Pref A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Jiangxi Fushine Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Fortune REIT SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


EA Technique M SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


bebe stores SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Apparel)


Iseki & Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery