AT&T's Transmission Systems Business Unit (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for AT&T's Transmission Systems Business Unit (A) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. AT&T's Transmission Systems Business Unit (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Rogelio Oliva, James Quinn, Elizabeth Keating. The AT&T's Transmission Systems Business Unit (A) (referred as “Apex Tsbu's” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Business processes, Change management, Collaboration, Communication, Competition, Entrepreneurship, Human resource management, Leading teams, Market research, Product development, Social responsibility, Strategy execution.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of AT&T's Transmission Systems Business Unit (A) Case Study

This case is available in only hard copy format (HBP does not have digital distribution rights to the content). As a result, a digital Educator Copy of the case is not available through this web site.The newly appointed director of the project dedicated to reducing product development time for AT&T's Transmission Systems Business Unit (TSBU) is trying to decide how best to sustain the momentum of its Achieving Process Excellence (APEX) teams. During the past three years, APEX teams helped reduce TSBU's product interval 50%--an accomplishment that contributed to TSBU's receiving the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. Now motivation and expectations for continued improvement are high. The case describes the launching of APEX, its evolution, and the current challenges facing the product development organization. Details support a discussion of the elements required to launch and sustain an improvement program, including metrics, goal setting, management's role, and methodological approaches for problem solving.

Case Authors : Rogelio Oliva, James Quinn, Elizabeth Keating

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Business processes, Change management, Collaboration, Communication, Competition, Entrepreneurship, Human resource management, Leading teams, Market research, Product development, Social responsibility, Strategy execution

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for AT&T's Transmission Systems Business Unit (A) Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10029473)	-10029473	-	-
Year 1	3450971	-6578502	3450971	0.9434	3255633
Year 2	3975988	-2602514	7426959	0.89	3538615
Year 3	3956553	1354039	11383512	0.8396	3321998
Year 4	3235853	4589892	14619365	0.7921	2563099
TOTAL			14619365		12679345

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2649872

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Apex Tsbu's shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Apex Tsbu's have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of AT&T's Transmission Systems Business Unit (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Apex Tsbu's often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Apex Tsbu's needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10029473)	-10029473	-	-
Year 1	3450971	-6578502	3450971	0.8696	3000844
Year 2	3975988	-2602514	7426959	0.7561	3006418
Year 3	3956553	1354039	11383512	0.6575	2601498
Year 4	3235853	4589892	14619365	0.5718	1850109
TOTAL					10458870

The Net NPV after 4 years is 429397

(10458870 - 10029473 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10029473)	-10029473	-	-
Year 1	3450971	-6578502	3450971	0.8333	2875809
Year 2	3975988	-2602514	7426959	0.6944	2761103
Year 3	3956553	1354039	11383512	0.5787	2289672
Year 4	3235853	4589892	14619365	0.4823	1560500
TOTAL					9487084

The Net NPV after 4 years is -542389

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9487084 - 10029473 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Apex Tsbu's to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Apex Tsbu's has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Apex Tsbu's can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Apex Tsbu's, then the stock price of the Apex Tsbu's should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Apex Tsbu's should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of AT&T's Transmission Systems Business Unit (A)

References & Further Readings

Rogelio Oliva, James Quinn, Elizabeth Keating (2018), "AT&T's Transmission Systems Business Unit (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.