×




Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Karen Robson, Kirk Plangger, Jan H. Kietzmann, Ian McCarthy. The Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification (referred as “Gamification Game” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Customer service, Developing employees, Motivating people, Productivity, Psychology, Technology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification Case Study


There is growing interest in how gamification--defined as the application of game design principles in non-gaming contexts--can be used in business. However, academic research and management practice have paid little attention to the challenges of how best to design, implement, manage, and optimize gamification strategies. To advance understanding of gamification, this article defines what it is and explains how it prompts managers to think about business practice in new and innovative ways. Drawing upon the game design literature, we present a framework of three gamification principles--mechanics, dynamics, and emotions (MDE)--to explain how gamified experiences can be created. We then provide an extended illustration of gamification and conclude with ideas for future research and application opportunities.


Case Authors : Karen Robson, Kirk Plangger, Jan H. Kietzmann, Ian McCarthy

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Customer service, Developing employees, Motivating people, Productivity, Psychology, Technology




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000822) -10000822 - -
Year 1 3457011 -6543811 3457011 0.9434 3261331
Year 2 3965107 -2578704 7422118 0.89 3528931
Year 3 3962579 1383875 11384697 0.8396 3327058
Year 4 3243622 4627497 14628319 0.7921 2569252
TOTAL 14628319 12686572




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2685750

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Gamification Game shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Gamification Game have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Gamification Game often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Gamification Game needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000822) -10000822 - -
Year 1 3457011 -6543811 3457011 0.8696 3006097
Year 2 3965107 -2578704 7422118 0.7561 2998191
Year 3 3962579 1383875 11384697 0.6575 2605460
Year 4 3243622 4627497 14628319 0.5718 1854551
TOTAL 10464298


The Net NPV after 4 years is 463476

(10464298 - 10000822 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000822) -10000822 - -
Year 1 3457011 -6543811 3457011 0.8333 2880843
Year 2 3965107 -2578704 7422118 0.6944 2753547
Year 3 3962579 1383875 11384697 0.5787 2293159
Year 4 3243622 4627497 14628319 0.4823 1564247
TOTAL 9491795


The Net NPV after 4 years is -509027

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9491795 - 10000822 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Gamification Game to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Gamification Game has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Gamification Game can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Gamification Game, then the stock price of the Gamification Game should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Gamification Game should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification

References & Further Readings

Karen Robson, Kirk Plangger, Jan H. Kietzmann, Ian McCarthy (2018), "Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Dacian Gold Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Techmatrix Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Holosfind SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Aeso Holding SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Joules Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Nextgen SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Palfinger AG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


BrainPad Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Aerosun Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


South Ocean Holdings Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment