×




Recruit Japan: Harnessing Data to Create Value (Abridged) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Recruit Japan: Harnessing Data to Create Value (Abridged) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Recruit Japan: Harnessing Data to Create Value (Abridged) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Howard H. Yu, Thomas W. Malnight, Ivy Buche. The Recruit Japan: Harnessing Data to Create Value (Abridged) (referred as “Recruit Platforms” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Innovation, IT, Marketing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Recruit Japan: Harnessing Data to Create Value (Abridged) Case Study


Recruit Holdings, Japan's largest staffing firm and a leading marketing media company started out in the early 1960s as an advertising company publishing magazines for jobseekers. It scaled up over the following decades to add business verticals such as real estate, bridal, travel, beauty salons and restaurants. Spurred by the internet revolution in the early 2000s, Recruit launched job boards and websites for its diverse media businesses while also moving content online by digitizing many of its popular magazines. In the early 2010s, it transitioned into becoming a service provider with the launch of a number of web-based platforms that allowed SMEs to digitize several key activities, such as point-of-sale registers, reservations and payments. By 2015 Recruit's digital platforms had gained significant popularity and the company was generating enormous amounts of online data on types of transactions, end-user behaviors and SME business characteristics. It also held significant deep offline data that resided within the sales team. However, the platforms and the data was specific to individual businesses. Recruit began to push for a unified backbone platform that would cut across all businesses with vertically stacked integrated solutions. It also established an artificial intelligence (AI) research laboratory in Silicon Valley. The mandate was to apply the latest technologies in data analytics, machine learning and AI to achieve breakthrough innovation. At the same time, Recruit harbored global aspirations and embarked on international expansion, mainly through acquisitions. Its goal was to become the world's largest staffing firm by 2020 and the largest media company by 2030. Could Recruit replicate its business model successfully overseas? Could it leverage its people and technological platforms to transform itself into a truly global internet corporation? Could it cannibalize its existing businesses through data-driven innovations to leapfrog into the future?


Case Authors : Howard H. Yu, Thomas W. Malnight, Ivy Buche

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Innovation, IT, Marketing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Recruit Japan: Harnessing Data to Create Value (Abridged) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012449) -10012449 - -
Year 1 3458903 -6553546 3458903 0.9434 3263116
Year 2 3953361 -2600185 7412264 0.89 3518477
Year 3 3938392 1338207 11350656 0.8396 3306750
Year 4 3223520 4561727 14574176 0.7921 2553330
TOTAL 14574176 12641673




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2629224

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Recruit Platforms shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Recruit Platforms have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Recruit Japan: Harnessing Data to Create Value (Abridged)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Recruit Platforms often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Recruit Platforms needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012449) -10012449 - -
Year 1 3458903 -6553546 3458903 0.8696 3007742
Year 2 3953361 -2600185 7412264 0.7561 2989309
Year 3 3938392 1338207 11350656 0.6575 2589557
Year 4 3223520 4561727 14574176 0.5718 1843058
TOTAL 10429665


The Net NPV after 4 years is 417216

(10429665 - 10012449 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012449) -10012449 - -
Year 1 3458903 -6553546 3458903 0.8333 2882419
Year 2 3953361 -2600185 7412264 0.6944 2745390
Year 3 3938392 1338207 11350656 0.5787 2279162
Year 4 3223520 4561727 14574176 0.4823 1554552
TOTAL 9461523


The Net NPV after 4 years is -550926

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9461523 - 10012449 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Recruit Platforms to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Recruit Platforms has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Recruit Platforms can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Recruit Platforms, then the stock price of the Recruit Platforms should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Recruit Platforms should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Recruit Japan: Harnessing Data to Create Value (Abridged)

References & Further Readings

Howard H. Yu, Thomas W. Malnight, Ivy Buche (2018), "Recruit Japan: Harnessing Data to Create Value (Abridged) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Reckitt Benckiser SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Taisei Co SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


Altri SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Paper & Paper Products


Bioquell PLC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Affine SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Bowleven SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations