Workplace Safety at Alcoa (B) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Workplace Safety at Alcoa (B) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Workplace Safety at Alcoa (B) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Steven J. Spear. The Workplace Safety at Alcoa (B) (referred as “Alcoa Safety” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, IT, Manufacturing, Personnel policies, Workspaces.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Workplace Safety at Alcoa (B) Case Study

At the May 1996 annual shareholders meeting, Alcoa CEO Paul O'Neill reported that Alcoa was making great progress toward becoming a world-class leader, both in terms of workplace safety and profitability. This validated of O'Neill's decade-long emphasis on safety as the company's leading value. Despite these achievements, O'Neill was challenged on Alcoa's treatment of employees in the company's Mexican plants. A Benedictine nun accused the company of treating its workers poorly and systematically violating its much publicized value system. Now, one month after the contentious exchange with the sister, O'Neill considers the report of an investigation team he had dispatched to the Mexican plants and the observations he made during his own visit to the factories. Builds on Workplace Safety at Alcoa (A), a case, in which students learn about Alcoa's efforts to become a safety leader and to wrestle with issues related to changing the physical work setting and the behavior and attitudes of people (employees and managers in that setting). This case is set several years later, after Alcoa has made tremendous progress in safety and profitability.

Case Authors : Steven J. Spear

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : IT, Manufacturing, Personnel policies, Workspaces

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Workplace Safety at Alcoa (B) Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10024932)	-10024932	-	-
Year 1	3464081	-6560851	3464081	0.9434	3268001
Year 2	3966634	-2594217	7430715	0.89	3530290
Year 3	3972173	1377956	11402888	0.8396	3335113
Year 4	3224177	4602133	14627065	0.7921	2553850
TOTAL			14627065		12687254

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2662322

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Alcoa Safety shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Alcoa Safety have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Workplace Safety at Alcoa (B)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Alcoa Safety often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Alcoa Safety needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10024932)	-10024932	-	-
Year 1	3464081	-6560851	3464081	0.8696	3012244
Year 2	3966634	-2594217	7430715	0.7561	2999345
Year 3	3972173	1377956	11402888	0.6575	2611768
Year 4	3224177	4602133	14627065	0.5718	1843434
TOTAL					10466791

The Net NPV after 4 years is 441859

(10466791 - 10024932 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10024932)	-10024932	-	-
Year 1	3464081	-6560851	3464081	0.8333	2886734
Year 2	3966634	-2594217	7430715	0.6944	2754607
Year 3	3972173	1377956	11402888	0.5787	2298711
Year 4	3224177	4602133	14627065	0.4823	1554869
TOTAL					9494922

The Net NPV after 4 years is -530010

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9494922 - 10024932 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Alcoa Safety to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Alcoa Safety has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Alcoa Safety can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Alcoa Safety, then the stock price of the Alcoa Safety should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Alcoa Safety should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Workplace Safety at Alcoa (B)

References & Further Readings

Steven J. Spear (2018), "Workplace Safety at Alcoa (B) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.