×




Spartan Stores, Inc.: Reengineering for Efficient Consumer Response Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Spartan Stores, Inc.: Reengineering for Efficient Consumer Response case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Spartan Stores, Inc.: Reengineering for Efficient Consumer Response case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by James L. McKenney, William T. Schiano. The Spartan Stores, Inc.: Reengineering for Efficient Consumer Response (referred as “Spartan Reengineering” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, IT.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Spartan Stores, Inc.: Reengineering for Efficient Consumer Response Case Study


Describes an effort to rationalize operations at a leading grocery wholesaler, enabled by information systems. Spartan Stores, Inc., is cooperatively owned by its 238 retailers and, through training, consulting, systems support, and cost of goods efficiencies, strives to keep its retailers competitive with larger stores in their markets. The reengineering project covered all processes in the firm, including administration, finance, purchasing, logistics, information technology, and services.


Case Authors : James L. McKenney, William T. Schiano

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : IT




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Spartan Stores, Inc.: Reengineering for Efficient Consumer Response Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021286) -10021286 - -
Year 1 3461637 -6559649 3461637 0.9434 3265695
Year 2 3967938 -2591711 7429575 0.89 3531451
Year 3 3955390 1363679 11384965 0.8396 3321022
Year 4 3238540 4602219 14623505 0.7921 2565227
TOTAL 14623505 12683395




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2662109

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Spartan Reengineering have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Spartan Reengineering shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Spartan Stores, Inc.: Reengineering for Efficient Consumer Response

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Spartan Reengineering often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Spartan Reengineering needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021286) -10021286 - -
Year 1 3461637 -6559649 3461637 0.8696 3010119
Year 2 3967938 -2591711 7429575 0.7561 3000331
Year 3 3955390 1363679 11384965 0.6575 2600733
Year 4 3238540 4602219 14623505 0.5718 1851646
TOTAL 10462829


The Net NPV after 4 years is 441543

(10462829 - 10021286 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021286) -10021286 - -
Year 1 3461637 -6559649 3461637 0.8333 2884698
Year 2 3967938 -2591711 7429575 0.6944 2755513
Year 3 3955390 1363679 11384965 0.5787 2288999
Year 4 3238540 4602219 14623505 0.4823 1561796
TOTAL 9491005


The Net NPV after 4 years is -530281

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9491005 - 10021286 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Spartan Reengineering to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Spartan Reengineering has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Spartan Reengineering can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Spartan Reengineering, then the stock price of the Spartan Reengineering should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Spartan Reengineering should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Spartan Stores, Inc.: Reengineering for Efficient Consumer Response

References & Further Readings

James L. McKenney, William T. Schiano (2018), "Spartan Stores, Inc.: Reengineering for Efficient Consumer Response Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


DIC India Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Louis Vuitton SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Kolon Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Ability SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Grand-Flo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Multipolar Technology SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Matson SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


Qwest Corp 7% SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Polemos SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Kumba Iron Ore SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Electrosteel Castings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures