×




Calgary Drop-In Centre: Donor Information System Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Calgary Drop-In Centre: Donor Information System case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Calgary Drop-In Centre: Donor Information System case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Derrick Neufeld, Deb Elkink, Michelle Woo, Dennis Dupuis. The Calgary Drop-In Centre: Donor Information System (referred as “Donor Organization's” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Managing people, Social enterprise.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Calgary Drop-In Centre: Donor Information System Case Study


In the spring of 2016, the director of finance and administration for the Calgary Drop-In & Rehab Centre was frustrated with the organization's legacy donor and volunteer information system. The technology platform was outdated, data integrity was out of control, costs were spiralling, and most importantly, required information was not available on demand. The director was concerned that these issues with the organization's information systems would interfere with its ability to maintain positive relationships with existing donors and to secure new financial supporters-ultimately, that it could have an impact on the agency's efforts to achieve more good in the community. He was contemplating three options to solve this problem: build a new in-house system to replace the current Microsoft Access database system; purchase customer relationship management software specifically developed for non-profit fundraising and relationship management and install this on personal computers and servers in the offices; or adopt a cloud-based fundraising solution, where the organization's data would be stored on a secure, shared platform administered by the vendor.


Case Authors : Derrick Neufeld, Deb Elkink, Michelle Woo, Dennis Dupuis

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Managing people, Social enterprise




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Calgary Drop-In Centre: Donor Information System Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015080) -10015080 - -
Year 1 3446182 -6568898 3446182 0.9434 3251115
Year 2 3979927 -2588971 7426109 0.89 3542121
Year 3 3952291 1363320 11378400 0.8396 3318420
Year 4 3249947 4613267 14628347 0.7921 2574262
TOTAL 14628347 12685918




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2670838

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Donor Organization's shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Donor Organization's have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Calgary Drop-In Centre: Donor Information System

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Donor Organization's often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Donor Organization's needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015080) -10015080 - -
Year 1 3446182 -6568898 3446182 0.8696 2996680
Year 2 3979927 -2588971 7426109 0.7561 3009397
Year 3 3952291 1363320 11378400 0.6575 2598695
Year 4 3249947 4613267 14628347 0.5718 1858168
TOTAL 10462940


The Net NPV after 4 years is 447860

(10462940 - 10015080 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015080) -10015080 - -
Year 1 3446182 -6568898 3446182 0.8333 2871818
Year 2 3979927 -2588971 7426109 0.6944 2763838
Year 3 3952291 1363320 11378400 0.5787 2287205
Year 4 3249947 4613267 14628347 0.4823 1567297
TOTAL 9490159


The Net NPV after 4 years is -524921

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9490159 - 10015080 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Donor Organization's to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Donor Organization's has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Donor Organization's can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Donor Organization's, then the stock price of the Donor Organization's should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Donor Organization's should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Calgary Drop-In Centre: Donor Information System

References & Further Readings

Derrick Neufeld, Deb Elkink, Michelle Woo, Dennis Dupuis (2018), "Calgary Drop-In Centre: Donor Information System Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


IBKS No.10 SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Maya Gold Silver SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Life Healthcar SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Man Sang Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Jewelry & Silverware


Nanjing Hicin Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Daemyungoration SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Jindal Worldwide SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Chembio SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Aura Energy Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Enzon SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs