×




Market Choices of a Chinese Outsourcing Vendor: The Case of ChilTech Company Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Market Choices of a Chinese Outsourcing Vendor: The Case of ChilTech Company case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Market Choices of a Chinese Outsourcing Vendor: The Case of ChilTech Company case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Fang Su, Ji-Ye Mao. The Market Choices of a Chinese Outsourcing Vendor: The Case of ChilTech Company (referred as “Outsourcing Vendors” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Operations management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment




Case Description of Market Choices of a Chinese Outsourcing Vendor: The Case of ChilTech Company Case Study


This case describes a Chinese software outsourcing vendor's struggle with its market choices, in response to the rippling effect of the global financial crisis. It also introduces Chinese software outsourcing vendors' capability development, market conditions, and idiosyncrasies. ChiITech is representative of Chinese software vendors, in terms of its development history, environment conditions, experience of the financial crisis, and countermeasures. Students can learn about the evolution and current status of the China-Japan software outsourcing industry through this case, and more specifically how vendors make market choices in a highly volatile market.


Case Authors : Fang Su, Ji-Ye Mao

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Operations management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Market Choices of a Chinese Outsourcing Vendor: The Case of ChilTech Company Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015601) -10015601 - -
Year 1 3459650 -6555951 3459650 0.9434 3263821
Year 2 3955515 -2600436 7415165 0.89 3520394
Year 3 3941028 1340592 11356193 0.8396 3308963
Year 4 3247340 4587932 14603533 0.7921 2572197
TOTAL 14603533 12665376


The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2649775

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Outsourcing Vendors have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Outsourcing Vendors shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.




Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Market Choices of a Chinese Outsourcing Vendor: The Case of ChilTech Company

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Outsourcing Vendors often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Outsourcing Vendors needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015601) -10015601 - -
Year 1 3459650 -6555951 3459650 0.8696 3008391
Year 2 3955515 -2600436 7415165 0.7561 2990938
Year 3 3941028 1340592 11356193 0.6575 2591290
Year 4 3247340 4587932 14603533 0.5718 1856677
TOTAL 10447296


The Net NPV after 4 years is 431695

(10447296 - 10015601 )






Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015601) -10015601 - -
Year 1 3459650 -6555951 3459650 0.8333 2883042
Year 2 3955515 -2600436 7415165 0.6944 2746885
Year 3 3941028 1340592 11356193 0.5787 2280688
Year 4 3247340 4587932 14603533 0.4823 1566040
TOTAL 9476654


The Net NPV after 4 years is -538947

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9476654 - 10015601 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Outsourcing Vendors to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.



Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Outsourcing Vendors has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Outsourcing Vendors can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Outsourcing Vendors, then the stock price of the Outsourcing Vendors should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Outsourcing Vendors should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.




References & Further Readings

Fang Su, Ji-Ye Mao (2018), "Market Choices of a Chinese Outsourcing Vendor: The Case of ChilTech Company Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.