×




The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by In Lee, Kyoochun Lee. The The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises (referred as “Iot Internet” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Internet, Supply chain.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises Case Study


The Internet of Things (IoT), also called the Internet of Everything or the Industrial Internet, is a new technology paradigm envisioned as a global network of machines and devices capable of interacting with each other. The IoT is recognized as one of the most important areas of future technology and is gaining vast attention from a wide range of industries. This article presents five IoT technologies that are essential in the deployment of successful IoT-based products and services and discusses three IoT categories for enterprise applications used to enhance customer value. In addition, it examines the net present value method and the real option approach widely used in the justification of technology projects and illustrates how the real option approach can be applied for IoT investment. Finally, this article discusses five technical and managerial challenges.


Case Authors : In Lee, Kyoochun Lee

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Internet, Supply chain




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010973) -10010973 - -
Year 1 3461924 -6549049 3461924 0.9434 3265966
Year 2 3961893 -2587156 7423817 0.89 3526071
Year 3 3965413 1378257 11389230 0.8396 3329437
Year 4 3233146 4611403 14622376 0.7921 2560954
TOTAL 14622376 12682428




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2671455

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Iot Internet have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Iot Internet shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Iot Internet often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Iot Internet needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010973) -10010973 - -
Year 1 3461924 -6549049 3461924 0.8696 3010369
Year 2 3961893 -2587156 7423817 0.7561 2995760
Year 3 3965413 1378257 11389230 0.6575 2607323
Year 4 3233146 4611403 14622376 0.5718 1848562
TOTAL 10462014


The Net NPV after 4 years is 451041

(10462014 - 10010973 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010973) -10010973 - -
Year 1 3461924 -6549049 3461924 0.8333 2884937
Year 2 3961893 -2587156 7423817 0.6944 2751315
Year 3 3965413 1378257 11389230 0.5787 2294799
Year 4 3233146 4611403 14622376 0.4823 1559195
TOTAL 9490245


The Net NPV after 4 years is -520728

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9490245 - 10010973 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Iot Internet to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Iot Internet has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Iot Internet can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Iot Internet, then the stock price of the Iot Internet should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Iot Internet should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises

References & Further Readings

In Lee, Kyoochun Lee (2018), "The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Lict Corporation SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Sienna Biopharm SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


CBI SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Maximus SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


JT SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Lucibel SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Chinook Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Canada Carbon Inc. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Non-Metallic Mining