Information Technology at Cirque du Soleil: Looking Back, Moving Forward Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Information Technology at Cirque du Soleil: Looking Back, Moving Forward case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Information Technology at Cirque du Soleil: Looking Back, Moving Forward case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Suzanne Rivard, Alain Pinsonneault, Anne-Marie Croteau. The Information Technology at Cirque du Soleil: Looking Back, Moving Forward (referred as “Cirque Soleil” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Knowledge management, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Information Technology at Cirque du Soleil: Looking Back, Moving Forward Case Study

The case takes place in early 2008. It illustrates the remarkable use that Cirque du Soleil makes of information technology. The case is based, in part, on the keynote speech that Danielle Savoie - who was then Vice-President of Information Technology and Knowledge Management at Cirque du Soleil - gave at the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) in Montreal in December 2007. The case is structured around the touring show life cycle and describes how information technology supports the complete process involved in designing, producing, staffing and diffusing shows at Cirque du Soleil. The case presents key infrastructure and applications and offers insights into how IT can support the key operational processes in an artistic, creative and innovative organization.

Case Authors : Suzanne Rivard, Alain Pinsonneault, Anne-Marie Croteau

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Knowledge management, Strategy

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Information Technology at Cirque du Soleil: Looking Back, Moving Forward Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10003246)	-10003246	-	-
Year 1	3457686	-6545560	3457686	0.9434	3261968
Year 2	3953805	-2591755	7411491	0.89	3518872
Year 3	3959107	1367352	11370598	0.8396	3324143
Year 4	3248343	4615695	14618941	0.7921	2572992
TOTAL			14618941		12677975

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2674729

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Cirque Soleil have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Cirque Soleil shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Information Technology at Cirque du Soleil: Looking Back, Moving Forward

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Cirque Soleil often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Cirque Soleil needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10003246)	-10003246	-	-
Year 1	3457686	-6545560	3457686	0.8696	3006683
Year 2	3953805	-2591755	7411491	0.7561	2989645
Year 3	3959107	1367352	11370598	0.6575	2603177
Year 4	3248343	4615695	14618941	0.5718	1857251
TOTAL					10456756

The Net NPV after 4 years is 453510

(10456756 - 10003246 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10003246)	-10003246	-	-
Year 1	3457686	-6545560	3457686	0.8333	2881405
Year 2	3953805	-2591755	7411491	0.6944	2745698
Year 3	3959107	1367352	11370598	0.5787	2291150
Year 4	3248343	4615695	14618941	0.4823	1566523
TOTAL					9484776

The Net NPV after 4 years is -518470

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9484776 - 10003246 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Cirque Soleil to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Cirque Soleil has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Cirque Soleil can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Cirque Soleil, then the stock price of the Cirque Soleil should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Cirque Soleil should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Information Technology at Cirque du Soleil: Looking Back, Moving Forward

References & Further Readings

Suzanne Rivard, Alain Pinsonneault, Anne-Marie Croteau (2018), "Information Technology at Cirque du Soleil: Looking Back, Moving Forward Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.