×




Bose Corp.: The JIT II Program (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Bose Corp.: The JIT II Program (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Bose Corp.: The JIT II Program (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Roy D. Shapiro, Bruce Isaacson. The Bose Corp.: The JIT II Program (A) (referred as “Bose Vendors” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Joint ventures, Manufacturing, Strategic planning, Supply chain.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Bose Corp.: The JIT II Program (A) Case Study


Bose Corp. is evaluating an unusual plan to manage relationships with vendors that supply components for Bose speakers. The company must decide: 1) which planning and ordering activities should be performed by Bose and which can be performed by vendors, 2) how much access vendors should have to Bose computer systems and facilities, and 3) how to adapt vendor relations as the company grows or as markets change. Students are asked to consider both the buyer's and the vendor's perspective on the buyer-seller relationship.


Case Authors : Roy D. Shapiro, Bruce Isaacson

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Joint ventures, Manufacturing, Strategic planning, Supply chain




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Bose Corp.: The JIT II Program (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011330) -10011330 - -
Year 1 3447056 -6564274 3447056 0.9434 3251940
Year 2 3973016 -2591258 7420072 0.89 3535970
Year 3 3946649 1355391 11366721 0.8396 3313683
Year 4 3228895 4584286 14595616 0.7921 2557587
TOTAL 14595616 12659180




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2647850

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Bose Vendors shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Bose Vendors have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Bose Corp.: The JIT II Program (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Bose Vendors often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Bose Vendors needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011330) -10011330 - -
Year 1 3447056 -6564274 3447056 0.8696 2997440
Year 2 3973016 -2591258 7420072 0.7561 3004171
Year 3 3946649 1355391 11366721 0.6575 2594986
Year 4 3228895 4584286 14595616 0.5718 1846131
TOTAL 10442728


The Net NPV after 4 years is 431398

(10442728 - 10011330 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011330) -10011330 - -
Year 1 3447056 -6564274 3447056 0.8333 2872547
Year 2 3973016 -2591258 7420072 0.6944 2759039
Year 3 3946649 1355391 11366721 0.5787 2283940
Year 4 3228895 4584286 14595616 0.4823 1557145
TOTAL 9472671


The Net NPV after 4 years is -538659

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9472671 - 10011330 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Bose Vendors to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Bose Vendors has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Bose Vendors can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Bose Vendors, then the stock price of the Bose Vendors should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Bose Vendors should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Bose Corp.: The JIT II Program (A)

References & Further Readings

Roy D. Shapiro, Bruce Isaacson (2018), "Bose Corp.: The JIT II Program (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Catalent Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Campbell Soup SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


ChoA Pharmaceutical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


BOE Tech Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Document Security SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Security Systems & Services


Fujian Apex Software SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Somfy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Stellar Megaunion A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products


Shanghai Highly B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Zotefoams PLC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


Dr Reddys Labs SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


San Miguel Brewery Hong Kong SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)