×




BAE Automated Systems (A): Denver International Airport Baggage-Handling System Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for BAE Automated Systems (A): Denver International Airport Baggage-Handling System case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. BAE Automated Systems (A): Denver International Airport Baggage-Handling System case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Lynda M. Applegate, Ramiro Montealegre, H. James Nelson, Carin-Isabel Knoop. The BAE Automated Systems (A): Denver International Airport Baggage-Handling System (referred as “Bae Baggage” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Communication, Decision making, Design, Government, Negotiations, Project management, Time management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of BAE Automated Systems (A): Denver International Airport Baggage-Handling System Case Study


Describes the events surrounding the construction of the BAE baggage-handling system at the Denver International Airport. It looks specifically at project management, including decisions regarding budget, scheduling, and the overall management structure. Also examines the airport's attempt to work with a great number of outside contractors, including BAE, and coordinate them into a productive whole, while under considerable political pressures. Approaches the project from the point of view of BAE's management, which struggles to fulfill its contract, work well with project management and other contractors, and deal with supply, scheduling, and engineering difficulties.


Case Authors : Lynda M. Applegate, Ramiro Montealegre, H. James Nelson, Carin-Isabel Knoop

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Communication, Decision making, Design, Government, Negotiations, Project management, Time management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for BAE Automated Systems (A): Denver International Airport Baggage-Handling System Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006539) -10006539 - -
Year 1 3464471 -6542068 3464471 0.9434 3268369
Year 2 3953346 -2588722 7417817 0.89 3518464
Year 3 3952928 1364206 11370745 0.8396 3318955
Year 4 3245075 4609281 14615820 0.7921 2570403
TOTAL 14615820 12676191




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2669652

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Bae Baggage shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Bae Baggage have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of BAE Automated Systems (A): Denver International Airport Baggage-Handling System

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Bae Baggage often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Bae Baggage needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006539) -10006539 - -
Year 1 3464471 -6542068 3464471 0.8696 3012583
Year 2 3953346 -2588722 7417817 0.7561 2989298
Year 3 3952928 1364206 11370745 0.6575 2599114
Year 4 3245075 4609281 14615820 0.5718 1855382
TOTAL 10456378


The Net NPV after 4 years is 449839

(10456378 - 10006539 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006539) -10006539 - -
Year 1 3464471 -6542068 3464471 0.8333 2887059
Year 2 3953346 -2588722 7417817 0.6944 2745379
Year 3 3952928 1364206 11370745 0.5787 2287574
Year 4 3245075 4609281 14615820 0.4823 1564947
TOTAL 9484960


The Net NPV after 4 years is -521579

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9484960 - 10006539 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Bae Baggage to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Bae Baggage has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Bae Baggage can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Bae Baggage, then the stock price of the Bae Baggage should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Bae Baggage should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of BAE Automated Systems (A): Denver International Airport Baggage-Handling System

References & Further Readings

Lynda M. Applegate, Ramiro Montealegre, H. James Nelson, Carin-Isabel Knoop (2018), "BAE Automated Systems (A): Denver International Airport Baggage-Handling System Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Jahwa Electron SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Jaya Tiasa SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Forestry & Wood Products


CVR Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Cherokee SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Apparel)


Excel Force MSC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Hill Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Cryosite Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Louis Vuitton SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Nice Holdings Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Home Improvement)


GBM Gold Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Capital World SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services