×




Longfor: A Non-Traditional Company in China - When in Rome, Do Not Do What the Romans Do Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Longfor: A Non-Traditional Company in China - When in Rome, Do Not Do What the Romans Do case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Longfor: A Non-Traditional Company in China - When in Rome, Do Not Do What the Romans Do case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Yidi Guo, Quy Huy, Lisa Duke, Xiao Zhixing. The Longfor: A Non-Traditional Company in China - When in Rome, Do Not Do What the Romans Do (referred as “Longfor Romans” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Creativity, Innovation, Organizational culture, Organizational structure, Psychology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Longfor: A Non-Traditional Company in China - When in Rome, Do Not Do What the Romans Do Case Study


Longfor, a real estate company in China, treats every customer as an individual with distinctive tastes, preferences and needs; the homes it designs emphasize aesthetics, comfort, landscaping and lifestyle in a holistic way. Likewise, its organizational culture emphasizes equality and professionalism in a country where hierarchy and deference to authority are the norm. Its approach to HR (recruitment, training, evaluation, compensation, role-modeling) is completely at odds with common practice in China. The case asks: Is it possible to succeed in business with an organizational culture that is alien to the society in which the company operates? How can emotional capital be generated and embedded in a company to facilitate strategic innovation?


Case Authors : Yidi Guo, Quy Huy, Lisa Duke, Xiao Zhixing

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Creativity, Innovation, Organizational culture, Organizational structure, Psychology




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Longfor: A Non-Traditional Company in China - When in Rome, Do Not Do What the Romans Do Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025011) -10025011 - -
Year 1 3469904 -6555107 3469904 0.9434 3273494
Year 2 3961544 -2593563 7431448 0.89 3525760
Year 3 3951261 1357698 11382709 0.8396 3317555
Year 4 3246747 4604445 14629456 0.7921 2571728
TOTAL 14629456 12688537




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2663526

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Longfor Romans shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Longfor Romans have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Longfor: A Non-Traditional Company in China - When in Rome, Do Not Do What the Romans Do

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Longfor Romans often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Longfor Romans needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025011) -10025011 - -
Year 1 3469904 -6555107 3469904 0.8696 3017308
Year 2 3961544 -2593563 7431448 0.7561 2995496
Year 3 3951261 1357698 11382709 0.6575 2598018
Year 4 3246747 4604445 14629456 0.5718 1856338
TOTAL 10467161


The Net NPV after 4 years is 442150

(10467161 - 10025011 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025011) -10025011 - -
Year 1 3469904 -6555107 3469904 0.8333 2891587
Year 2 3961544 -2593563 7431448 0.6944 2751072
Year 3 3951261 1357698 11382709 0.5787 2286609
Year 4 3246747 4604445 14629456 0.4823 1565754
TOTAL 9495022


The Net NPV after 4 years is -529989

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9495022 - 10025011 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Longfor Romans to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Longfor Romans has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Longfor Romans can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Longfor Romans, then the stock price of the Longfor Romans should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Longfor Romans should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Longfor: A Non-Traditional Company in China - When in Rome, Do Not Do What the Romans Do

References & Further Readings

Yidi Guo, Quy Huy, Lisa Duke, Xiao Zhixing (2018), "Longfor: A Non-Traditional Company in China - When in Rome, Do Not Do What the Romans Do Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Moberg Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Its Skin Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Lee & Man Chemical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Beaver SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Naim SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Salzgitter AG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Iron & Steel