A Pathway for Scotiabank's Innovation: Leveraging FinTech Partnerships Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for A Pathway for Scotiabank's Innovation: Leveraging FinTech Partnerships case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. A Pathway for Scotiabank's Innovation: Leveraging FinTech Partnerships case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jean-Philippe Vergne, Mary Weil, Ying-Ying Hsieh. The A Pathway for Scotiabank's Innovation: Leveraging FinTech Partnerships (referred as “Scotiabank's Kabbage” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of A Pathway for Scotiabank's Innovation: Leveraging FinTech Partnerships Case Study

In February 2017, Scotiabank's vice-president of digital enablement was sitting in his office at Scotiabank's Digital Factory in downtown Toronto. He was reflecting on his recent introduction to the financial technology (fintech) company Kabbage, and on how successfully the partnership was progressing. Scotiabank's vice-president was considering what opportunities the bank should pursue next, specifically in the area of blockchain. The Scotiabank-Kabbage partnership provided a valuable guideline for future partnerships. At the partnership's launch, the group head of Canadian banking at Scotiabank said that the partnership with Kabbage set "an example of how banks and fintechs are working together to provide customers with a better banking experience." However, all partnerships did not work in the same way. How could Scotiabank devise an effective partnership strategy, considering the unique contexts in different sectors and geographic markets?

Case Authors : Jean-Philippe Vergne, Mary Weil, Ying-Ying Hsieh

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas :

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for A Pathway for Scotiabank's Innovation: Leveraging FinTech Partnerships Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10009797)	-10009797	-	-
Year 1	3456199	-6553598	3456199	0.9434	3260565
Year 2	3981072	-2572526	7437271	0.89	3543140
Year 3	3972209	1399683	11409480	0.8396	3335143
Year 4	3232954	4632637	14642434	0.7921	2560802
TOTAL			14642434		12699651

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2689854

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Scotiabank's Kabbage have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Scotiabank's Kabbage shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of A Pathway for Scotiabank's Innovation: Leveraging FinTech Partnerships

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Scotiabank's Kabbage often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Scotiabank's Kabbage needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10009797)	-10009797	-	-
Year 1	3456199	-6553598	3456199	0.8696	3005390
Year 2	3981072	-2572526	7437271	0.7561	3010262
Year 3	3972209	1399683	11409480	0.6575	2611792
Year 4	3232954	4632637	14642434	0.5718	1848452
TOTAL					10475897

The Net NPV after 4 years is 466100

(10475897 - 10009797 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10009797)	-10009797	-	-
Year 1	3456199	-6553598	3456199	0.8333	2880166
Year 2	3981072	-2572526	7437271	0.6944	2764633
Year 3	3972209	1399683	11409480	0.5787	2298732
Year 4	3232954	4632637	14642434	0.4823	1559102
TOTAL					9502633

The Net NPV after 4 years is -507164

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9502633 - 10009797 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Scotiabank's Kabbage to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Scotiabank's Kabbage has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Scotiabank's Kabbage can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Scotiabank's Kabbage, then the stock price of the Scotiabank's Kabbage should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Scotiabank's Kabbage should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of A Pathway for Scotiabank's Innovation: Leveraging FinTech Partnerships

References & Further Readings

Jean-Philippe Vergne, Mary Weil, Ying-Ying Hsieh (2018), "A Pathway for Scotiabank's Innovation: Leveraging FinTech Partnerships Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.