×




Nephila: Innovation in Catastrophe Risk Insurance Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Nephila: Innovation in Catastrophe Risk Insurance case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Nephila: Innovation in Catastrophe Risk Insurance case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Kenneth A. Froot, Michael Heinrich. The Nephila: Innovation in Catastrophe Risk Insurance (referred as “Nephila Catastrophe” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Competition, Competitive strategy, Financial management, Financial markets, Innovation, Managing uncertainty, Marketing, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Nephila: Innovation in Catastrophe Risk Insurance Case Study


At the cross-section of capital markets and the catastrophe insurance space stands the hedge fund Nephila. Nephila must decide how best to take advantage of the newly presented market opportunities post hurricanes Katrina, Wilma, and Rita. Nephila has a plethora of options as it brings capital markets understanding to the insurance space. Nephila can easily trade in and out of insurance products and is not subject to regulatory restrictions. Yet, Nephila only capitalizes 1% of the entire catastrophe reinsurance market. What is the best way to grow?


Case Authors : Kenneth A. Froot, Michael Heinrich

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Competition, Competitive strategy, Financial management, Financial markets, Innovation, Managing uncertainty, Marketing, Risk management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Nephila: Innovation in Catastrophe Risk Insurance Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012905) -10012905 - -
Year 1 3450113 -6562792 3450113 0.9434 3254824
Year 2 3975350 -2587442 7425463 0.89 3538047
Year 3 3972776 1385334 11398239 0.8396 3335619
Year 4 3231342 4616676 14629581 0.7921 2559526
TOTAL 14629581 12688016




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2675111

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Nephila Catastrophe have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Nephila Catastrophe shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Nephila: Innovation in Catastrophe Risk Insurance

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Nephila Catastrophe often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Nephila Catastrophe needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012905) -10012905 - -
Year 1 3450113 -6562792 3450113 0.8696 3000098
Year 2 3975350 -2587442 7425463 0.7561 3005936
Year 3 3972776 1385334 11398239 0.6575 2612165
Year 4 3231342 4616676 14629581 0.5718 1847530
TOTAL 10465729


The Net NPV after 4 years is 452824

(10465729 - 10012905 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012905) -10012905 - -
Year 1 3450113 -6562792 3450113 0.8333 2875094
Year 2 3975350 -2587442 7425463 0.6944 2760660
Year 3 3972776 1385334 11398239 0.5787 2299060
Year 4 3231342 4616676 14629581 0.4823 1558325
TOTAL 9493139


The Net NPV after 4 years is -519766

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9493139 - 10012905 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Nephila Catastrophe to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Nephila Catastrophe has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Nephila Catastrophe can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Nephila Catastrophe, then the stock price of the Nephila Catastrophe should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Nephila Catastrophe should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Nephila: Innovation in Catastrophe Risk Insurance

References & Further Readings

Kenneth A. Froot, Michael Heinrich (2018), "Nephila: Innovation in Catastrophe Risk Insurance Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Atul Auto Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


Pengqi Tech A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


City Of London SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Macquarie Telecom SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Crown SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Casinos & Gaming


Medley Capital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


CGI Group Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Construction Partners SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


JIN Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)