JetBlue and the New Revenue Recognition Standard Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for JetBlue and the New Revenue Recognition Standard case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. JetBlue and the New Revenue Recognition Standard case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Emily Booth, Elizabeth Blankespoor, Jaclyn C. Foroughi. The JetBlue and the New Revenue Recognition Standard (referred as “Standard Jetblue” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Costs.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

Case Description of JetBlue and the New Revenue Recognition Standard Case Study

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued a converged standard on revenue recognition (ASC Topic 606 and IFRS 15, respectively) aimed at ameliorating difficulties associated with determining when to recognize revenue and at what amount. Prior revenue recognition standards applied broad concepts together with a variety of requirements for specific industries or types of transactions, sometimes resulting in divergent accounting for economically similar transactions. In contrast, the new standard outlined a single comprehensive model to use in accounting for revenue from contracts with customers. Although the new standard simplified the guidelines down to one framework, it also generally required firms to use more judgment and estimation than prior guidance. In its second quarter of 2014 financial statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in August 2014, New York-based airliner JetBlue Airways Corporation (JetBlue) [NASDAQ: JBLU] acknowledged the new revenue recognition standard. While it had yet to determine the full impact of adoption, changes were imminent. This case examines how companies' accounting practices are affected by broad-based new accounting standards. It is designed to introduce the new revenue recognition standard, and help students walk through an assessment of how the standard might impact a company like JetBlue Airways.

Case Authors : Emily Booth, Elizabeth Blankespoor, Jaclyn C. Foroughi

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Costs

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for JetBlue and the New Revenue Recognition Standard Case Study

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013529) -10013529 - -
Year 1 3444520 -6569009 3444520 0.9434 3249547
Year 2 3981868 -2587141 7426388 0.89 3543848
Year 3 3959464 1372323 11385852 0.8396 3324442
Year 4 3234683 4607006 14620535 0.7921 2562172
TOTAL 14620535 12680010

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2666481

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Standard Jetblue shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Standard Jetblue have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of JetBlue and the New Revenue Recognition Standard

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Standard Jetblue often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Standard Jetblue needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013529) -10013529 - -
Year 1 3444520 -6569009 3444520 0.8696 2995235
Year 2 3981868 -2587141 7426388 0.7561 3010864
Year 3 3959464 1372323 11385852 0.6575 2603412
Year 4 3234683 4607006 14620535 0.5718 1849441
TOTAL 10458951

The Net NPV after 4 years is 445422

(10458951 - 10013529 )

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013529) -10013529 - -
Year 1 3444520 -6569009 3444520 0.8333 2870433
Year 2 3981868 -2587141 7426388 0.6944 2765186
Year 3 3959464 1372323 11385852 0.5787 2291356
Year 4 3234683 4607006 14620535 0.4823 1559936
TOTAL 9486912

The Net NPV after 4 years is -526617

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9486912 - 10013529 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Standard Jetblue to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Standard Jetblue has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Standard Jetblue can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Standard Jetblue, then the stock price of the Standard Jetblue should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Standard Jetblue should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

References & Further Readings

Emily Booth, Elizabeth Blankespoor, Jaclyn C. Foroughi (2018), "JetBlue and the New Revenue Recognition Standard Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.