×




Building a Winning Business Model Portfolio Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Building a Winning Business Model Portfolio case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Building a Winning Business Model Portfolio case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Paolo Aversa, Stefan Haefliger, Danielle Giuliana Reza. The Building a Winning Business Model Portfolio (referred as “Models Business” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Building a Winning Business Model Portfolio Case Study


This is an MIT Sloan Management Review article. Across many industries, companies are using innovative business models as a basis for competitive advantage. In recent years, for example, upstarts such as Uber Technologies Inc. and Airbnb Inc. have used multi-sided business models to leverage ordinary resources against established competitors that rely on unique resources. Increasingly, organizations are adopting two or more business models at once to tap into resources and capabilities that aren't available through other means.As companies attempt to diversify into portfolios of business models that achieve higher performance than other configurations, they need to match their own resources and capabilities to the external opportunities they face. In this article, the authors argue that executives need to assess whether there is fit not only between the activities underpinning the business models they use but also across multiple business models. How can companies assess whether there are advantages to using multiple business models? And when might it make sense to focus on fewer business models rather than more? To develop their understanding of business models, the authors studied the Formula One auto racing industry, the various businesses operated by Amazon.com Inc., and nearly 50 other companies. This article addresses three core questions: What should you consider when thinking about business model diversification? In deciding to add a new business model to your portfolio, how can you assess and optimize its value? How should you modify your business model portfolio over time? Like other forms of corporate diversification, the authors say, business model diversification does not always generate superior performance. In settings where a business model isn't generating the synergies that were envisioned, managers shouldn't be afraid to streamline, improve, or divest from some business models in the portfolio to focus on and bolster the activities that are strategically optimal. Although it's common for executives to focus on financial performance, the authors write, "good managers seek to exploit new opportunities to create additional value, such as cross-selling, differentiation, reputation, user data, and capability development. Managed wisely, business model diversification can help executives improve performance and advance the purpose of the enterprise."


Case Authors : Paolo Aversa, Stefan Haefliger, Danielle Giuliana Reza

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Financial management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Building a Winning Business Model Portfolio Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019927) -10019927 - -
Year 1 3468892 -6551035 3468892 0.9434 3272540
Year 2 3954927 -2596108 7423819 0.89 3519871
Year 3 3970123 1374015 11393942 0.8396 3333392
Year 4 3222908 4596923 14616850 0.7921 2552845
TOTAL 14616850 12678647




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2658720

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Models Business have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Models Business shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Building a Winning Business Model Portfolio

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Models Business often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Models Business needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019927) -10019927 - -
Year 1 3468892 -6551035 3468892 0.8696 3016428
Year 2 3954927 -2596108 7423819 0.7561 2990493
Year 3 3970123 1374015 11393942 0.6575 2610420
Year 4 3222908 4596923 14616850 0.5718 1842708
TOTAL 10460049


The Net NPV after 4 years is 440122

(10460049 - 10019927 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019927) -10019927 - -
Year 1 3468892 -6551035 3468892 0.8333 2890743
Year 2 3954927 -2596108 7423819 0.6944 2746477
Year 3 3970123 1374015 11393942 0.5787 2297525
Year 4 3222908 4596923 14616850 0.4823 1554257
TOTAL 9489003


The Net NPV after 4 years is -530924

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9489003 - 10019927 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Models Business to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Models Business has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Models Business can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Models Business, then the stock price of the Models Business should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Models Business should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Building a Winning Business Model Portfolio

References & Further Readings

Paolo Aversa, Stefan Haefliger, Danielle Giuliana Reza (2018), "Building a Winning Business Model Portfolio Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Avnet SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Elnusa SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


T.Kawabe & SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Differ Holding Co SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Orange SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Samsung Pharm SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Itissalat Al-Maghrib SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services