×




Contract Labor at Regency Hospital: Legal and HR Dynamics Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Contract Labor at Regency Hospital: Legal and HR Dynamics case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Contract Labor at Regency Hospital: Legal and HR Dynamics case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Anjana Nath, Debi S. Saini. The Contract Labor at Regency Hospital: Legal and HR Dynamics (referred as “Gh Rh” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Communication. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Business law, Human resource management, Labor, Negotiations.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Contract Labor at Regency Hospital: Legal and HR Dynamics Case Study


This case brings to the fore different complexities of contract labor employment by principal employers (PE) in the Indian context, including sensitivities involved in handling contract workers' union. Regency Hospital (RH), a corporate Hospital chain in India, acquired Gedex Hospital (GH) in 2005, along with contract workers employed in the latter. In the year 1983, GH's management decided to employ contract workers for operating its support services like House Keeping, etc. Two years later, some contract workers of GH became members of the All Gedex Employees' Union. Apprehending industrial relations (IR) problems, GH decided to take them on its permanent rolls. Later on, more contract workers of GH formally became members of this Union, but GH did not concede their demand for permanency. These workers continued to work at GH and later at RH under different contractors; for they were well-trained hospital workforce. When RH acquired GH in 2005, some of the contract workers were doing the same work as was done by RH's core workers, and continued to work that way. In October 2015 all contract workers of RH went on strike. Their demands included increase in wages and absorbing them in RH's core workforce. RH argued that all that was the obligation of the contractor concerned through whom they were employed. RH's HR manager contacted the local police, which eventually helped in pacifying these contract workers leading to withdrawal of their agitation. In the meantime, the management enhanced some minor welfare benefits for them through the contractor, but no substantive relief was given. RH was pondering on action it should take, and how to prevent reoccurrence of similar complex situations. It was also considering the working environment that should be made available to contract workers so as to promote their engagement, and also avoiding any possible legal lapses on its part in handling contract labor issues.


Case Authors : Anjana Nath, Debi S. Saini

Topic : Communication

Related Areas : Business law, Human resource management, Labor, Negotiations




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Contract Labor at Regency Hospital: Legal and HR Dynamics Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014870) -10014870 - -
Year 1 3451943 -6562927 3451943 0.9434 3256550
Year 2 3982998 -2579929 7434941 0.89 3544854
Year 3 3939857 1359928 11374798 0.8396 3307980
Year 4 3235775 4595703 14610573 0.7921 2563037
TOTAL 14610573 12672421




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2657551

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Gh Rh shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Gh Rh have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Contract Labor at Regency Hospital: Legal and HR Dynamics

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Communication Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Gh Rh often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Gh Rh needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014870) -10014870 - -
Year 1 3451943 -6562927 3451943 0.8696 3001690
Year 2 3982998 -2579929 7434941 0.7561 3011719
Year 3 3939857 1359928 11374798 0.6575 2590520
Year 4 3235775 4595703 14610573 0.5718 1850065
TOTAL 10453993


The Net NPV after 4 years is 439123

(10453993 - 10014870 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014870) -10014870 - -
Year 1 3451943 -6562927 3451943 0.8333 2876619
Year 2 3982998 -2579929 7434941 0.6944 2765971
Year 3 3939857 1359928 11374798 0.5787 2280010
Year 4 3235775 4595703 14610573 0.4823 1560462
TOTAL 9483062


The Net NPV after 4 years is -531808

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9483062 - 10014870 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Gh Rh to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Gh Rh has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Gh Rh can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Gh Rh, then the stock price of the Gh Rh should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Gh Rh should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Contract Labor at Regency Hospital: Legal and HR Dynamics

References & Further Readings

Anjana Nath, Debi S. Saini (2018), "Contract Labor at Regency Hospital: Legal and HR Dynamics Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Hydrodec SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Iterum Therapeutics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Zhejiang Satellite Petrochem A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Costar Tech Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment


Clipper Realty SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Guangdong Guanghua Sci-Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Oxley Holdings Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations