×




Birch Benders Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Birch Benders case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Birch Benders case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by James Lattin, Matthew Saucedo. The Birch Benders (referred as “Benders Lacasse” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Sales.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Birch Benders Case Study


The Birch Benders case follows the story of Matt LaCasse and Lizzie Ackerman as they embark on a journey to make the world's best pancake mix. Through their trials and tribulations, the readers learn of the nuances involved in crafting an immaculate pancake recipe and then developing a business around it through effective branding, packaging, and distribution strategies. They realize that to scale the company successfully, they must retool their sales strategy. The case details LaCasse and Ackerman's search for a new VP of Sales, as well as a discussion on what the ideal candidate might look like.


Case Authors : James Lattin, Matthew Saucedo

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Sales




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Birch Benders Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006549) -10006549 - -
Year 1 3453631 -6552918 3453631 0.9434 3258142
Year 2 3967843 -2585075 7421474 0.89 3531366
Year 3 3964913 1379838 11386387 0.8396 3329017
Year 4 3248438 4628276 14634825 0.7921 2573067
TOTAL 14634825 12691593




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2685044

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Benders Lacasse have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Benders Lacasse shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Birch Benders

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Benders Lacasse often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Benders Lacasse needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006549) -10006549 - -
Year 1 3453631 -6552918 3453631 0.8696 3003157
Year 2 3967843 -2585075 7421474 0.7561 3000259
Year 3 3964913 1379838 11386387 0.6575 2606995
Year 4 3248438 4628276 14634825 0.5718 1857305
TOTAL 10467716


The Net NPV after 4 years is 461167

(10467716 - 10006549 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006549) -10006549 - -
Year 1 3453631 -6552918 3453631 0.8333 2878026
Year 2 3967843 -2585075 7421474 0.6944 2755447
Year 3 3964913 1379838 11386387 0.5787 2294510
Year 4 3248438 4628276 14634825 0.4823 1566569
TOTAL 9494551


The Net NPV after 4 years is -511998

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9494551 - 10006549 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Benders Lacasse to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Benders Lacasse has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Benders Lacasse can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Benders Lacasse, then the stock price of the Benders Lacasse should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Benders Lacasse should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Birch Benders

References & Further Readings

James Lattin, Matthew Saucedo (2018), "Birch Benders Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


KayDav Group Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Furniture & Fixtures


Foodnamoo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Canon SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Office Equipment


China Daye Non-Ferrous Metals SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Spuntech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Hebei Yangyuan ZhiHui SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Nonalcoholic)


Bankia SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Money Center Banks


Alamos Gold SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


AGS Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Paramount Bed Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.