×




Axonify: Budgeting for Rapid Growth Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Axonify: Budgeting for Rapid Growth case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Axonify: Budgeting for Rapid Growth case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Howard Armitage, Dave Pooley, Alan Webb. The Axonify: Budgeting for Rapid Growth (referred as “Axonify Budgets” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Technology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Axonify: Budgeting for Rapid Growth Case Study


In late 2016, Axonify, a Canadian technology company that managed a corporate online learning platform, was struggling to meet aggressive revenue growth targets while also controlling the costs of acquiring new customers. Axonify's chief financial officer had not imposed a top-down approach to developing budgets, nor had he attempted to closely monitor and control actual results against the budgeted costs. The members of the senior management team had been exercising considerable autonomy to develop their own functional area budgets and had been asked to explain only significant variances. The budgeting system had served Axonify well in its start-up phase. Would this "loose" budget system continue to work as the company grew, or should the chief financial officer have considered another budget process? Howard M. Armitage, Dave Pooley, Alan Webb are affiliated with University of Waterloo.


Case Authors : Howard Armitage, Dave Pooley, Alan Webb

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Technology




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Axonify: Budgeting for Rapid Growth Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029025) -10029025 - -
Year 1 3464962 -6564063 3464962 0.9434 3268832
Year 2 3970545 -2593518 7435507 0.89 3533771
Year 3 3964827 1371309 11400334 0.8396 3328945
Year 4 3244509 4615818 14644843 0.7921 2569955
TOTAL 14644843 12701503




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2672478

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Axonify Budgets shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Axonify Budgets have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Axonify: Budgeting for Rapid Growth

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Axonify Budgets often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Axonify Budgets needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029025) -10029025 - -
Year 1 3464962 -6564063 3464962 0.8696 3013010
Year 2 3970545 -2593518 7435507 0.7561 3002302
Year 3 3964827 1371309 11400334 0.6575 2606938
Year 4 3244509 4615818 14644843 0.5718 1855059
TOTAL 10477310


The Net NPV after 4 years is 448285

(10477310 - 10029025 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029025) -10029025 - -
Year 1 3464962 -6564063 3464962 0.8333 2887468
Year 2 3970545 -2593518 7435507 0.6944 2757323
Year 3 3964827 1371309 11400334 0.5787 2294460
Year 4 3244509 4615818 14644843 0.4823 1564674
TOTAL 9503926


The Net NPV after 4 years is -525099

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9503926 - 10029025 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Axonify Budgets to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Axonify Budgets has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Axonify Budgets can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Axonify Budgets, then the stock price of the Axonify Budgets should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Axonify Budgets should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Axonify: Budgeting for Rapid Growth

References & Further Readings

Howard Armitage, Dave Pooley, Alan Webb (2018), "Axonify: Budgeting for Rapid Growth Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Sappi Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Paper & Paper Products


Bombril SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Lakes Oil NL SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


Sarine Technologies Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Golden House SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


TMX Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Legrand SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Alstom SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Conglomerates , Conglomerates


Neto Malinda SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Singasia SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services