×




Monmouth Rubber & Plastics Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Monmouth Rubber & Plastics case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Monmouth Rubber & Plastics case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Stuart Rosenberg. The Monmouth Rubber & Plastics (referred as “Monmouth Rubber” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Generational issues, Organizational culture.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Monmouth Rubber & Plastics Case Study


John Bonforte, the owner and president of Monmouth Rubber & Plastics, a small private rubber manufacturing company in Long Branch, New Jersey, needed to decide whether to accept an offer from a potential buyer for the business. Monmouth had been a successful company with a strong family culture since John founded it in 1964, but now in 2008 there were a number of factors that gave him reason for concern and to consider whether it was time to sell. The world economy was showing signs of slowing down. Other rubber manufacturers were forced to close down. The long term sales forecast for Monmouth was not promising. Further, the city of Long Branch, which had been in decline for years, had established a redevelopment zone for the oceanfront and its adjacent neighborhoods in 1996. The city determined that it would invoke eminent domain for properties within the redevelopment zone in need of improvement. The private homeowners and commercial business owners who were located in the designated area, including Monmouth Rubber, were compelled to negotiate with a property developer that had been contracted by the city. Many property owners refused to sell, and the case was on appeal with the New Jersey Superior Court. This created significant uncertainty surrounding Monmouth Rubber's ability to remain in its current location. At 67, John could sell the business and retire. Although his son, John Jr., had been employed by Monmouth for several years and was the firm's sales manager, there was no formal succession plan. John Jr., however, had expressed an interest in taking over the business. With a lucrative offer on the table, John needed to consider the changing competitive landscape for the industry, the weakened economic conditions, and the eminent domain. This case is suitable for courses in family business management, and it can be especially useful as an introductory case or as a second case.


Case Authors : Stuart Rosenberg

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Generational issues, Organizational culture




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Monmouth Rubber & Plastics Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001783) -10001783 - -
Year 1 3452499 -6549284 3452499 0.9434 3257075
Year 2 3980705 -2568579 7433204 0.89 3542813
Year 3 3960324 1391745 11393528 0.8396 3325164
Year 4 3227274 4619019 14620802 0.7921 2556303
TOTAL 14620802 12681355




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2679572

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Monmouth Rubber shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Monmouth Rubber have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Monmouth Rubber & Plastics

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Monmouth Rubber often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Monmouth Rubber needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001783) -10001783 - -
Year 1 3452499 -6549284 3452499 0.8696 3002173
Year 2 3980705 -2568579 7433204 0.7561 3009985
Year 3 3960324 1391745 11393528 0.6575 2603977
Year 4 3227274 4619019 14620802 0.5718 1845204
TOTAL 10461340


The Net NPV after 4 years is 459557

(10461340 - 10001783 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001783) -10001783 - -
Year 1 3452499 -6549284 3452499 0.8333 2877083
Year 2 3980705 -2568579 7433204 0.6944 2764378
Year 3 3960324 1391745 11393528 0.5787 2291854
Year 4 3227274 4619019 14620802 0.4823 1556363
TOTAL 9489678


The Net NPV after 4 years is -512105

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9489678 - 10001783 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Monmouth Rubber to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Monmouth Rubber has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Monmouth Rubber can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Monmouth Rubber, then the stock price of the Monmouth Rubber should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Monmouth Rubber should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Monmouth Rubber & Plastics

References & Further Readings

Stuart Rosenberg (2018), "Monmouth Rubber & Plastics Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


VS Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


Panca Budi Idaman SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


Hopson Development SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Kernex Microsystems India SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Security Systems & Services


Shanghai Yahong Moulding SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Fiat SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


Daewoong Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Peak Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Sanyodo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)


Keybridge Capital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services