Aetna and the Transformation of Health Care Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Aetna and the Transformation of Health Care case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Aetna and the Transformation of Health Care case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Rebecca Henderson, Russell A. Eisenstat, Matthew Preble. The Aetna and the Transformation of Health Care (referred as “Aetna Bertolini” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Organizational culture, Strategy, Supply chain.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Aetna and the Transformation of Health Care Case Study

Mark Bertolini, chairman and CEO of the health insurer Aetna, faces a number of questions as he seeks to transform Aetna from a classic insurance company, into a business that will engage much more deeply with its members around their personal health goals. His strategy depends on Aetna's ability to facilitate behavioral changes amongst its members to live healthier lives, and requires very significant investments in digital capabilities and on the ground community orientated health care resources. Will it work? Can he implement it? The case explores both the strategic issues inherent in this potential transformation and the organizational and leadership questions that it raises. Bertolini is a highly purpose driven leader, and the case allows for a rich discussion of the degree to which this changes both his strategic and his organizational options.

Case Authors : Rebecca Henderson, Russell A. Eisenstat, Matthew Preble

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Organizational culture, Strategy, Supply chain

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Aetna and the Transformation of Health Care Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10026148)	-10026148	-	-
Year 1	3469986	-6556162	3469986	0.9434	3273572
Year 2	3955494	-2600668	7425480	0.89	3520376
Year 3	3949914	1349246	11375394	0.8396	3316424
Year 4	3233165	4582411	14608559	0.7921	2560970
TOTAL			14608559		12671341

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2645193

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Aetna Bertolini shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Aetna Bertolini have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Aetna and the Transformation of Health Care

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Aetna Bertolini often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Aetna Bertolini needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10026148)	-10026148	-	-
Year 1	3469986	-6556162	3469986	0.8696	3017379
Year 2	3955494	-2600668	7425480	0.7561	2990922
Year 3	3949914	1349246	11375394	0.6575	2597133
Year 4	3233165	4582411	14608559	0.5718	1848573
TOTAL					10454006

The Net NPV after 4 years is 427858

(10454006 - 10026148 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10026148)	-10026148	-	-
Year 1	3469986	-6556162	3469986	0.8333	2891655
Year 2	3955494	-2600668	7425480	0.6944	2746871
Year 3	3949914	1349246	11375394	0.5787	2285830
Year 4	3233165	4582411	14608559	0.4823	1559204
TOTAL					9483559

The Net NPV after 4 years is -542589

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9483559 - 10026148 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Aetna Bertolini to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Aetna Bertolini has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Aetna Bertolini can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Aetna Bertolini, then the stock price of the Aetna Bertolini should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Aetna Bertolini should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Aetna and the Transformation of Health Care

References & Further Readings

Rebecca Henderson, Russell A. Eisenstat, Matthew Preble (2018), "Aetna and the Transformation of Health Care Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.