×




When Communication Should Be Formal Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for When Communication Should Be Formal case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. When Communication Should Be Formal case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Antti Tenhiala, Fabrizio Salvador. The When Communication Should Be Formal (referred as “Formal Communication” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Developing employees.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of When Communication Should Be Formal Case Study


Formal communication channels, such as protocol-guided meetings, are often eschewed by today's managers and employees, who prefer the ease of email and apps. But informal avenues can lead to oversights and inefficiencies that hurt performance. That's the central finding of research from IE Business School on manufacturers of high-tech machinery. Fortunately, formal communication protocols can be designed to both maximize performance and overcome people's resistance to adopting them.


Case Authors : Antti Tenhiala, Fabrizio Salvador

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Developing employees




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for When Communication Should Be Formal Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013407) -10013407 - -
Year 1 3449619 -6563788 3449619 0.9434 3254358
Year 2 3970459 -2593329 7420078 0.89 3533694
Year 3 3970258 1376929 11390336 0.8396 3333505
Year 4 3247965 4624894 14638301 0.7921 2572692
TOTAL 14638301 12694250




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2680843

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Formal Communication have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Formal Communication shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of When Communication Should Be Formal

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Formal Communication often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Formal Communication needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013407) -10013407 - -
Year 1 3449619 -6563788 3449619 0.8696 2999669
Year 2 3970459 -2593329 7420078 0.7561 3002237
Year 3 3970258 1376929 11390336 0.6575 2610509
Year 4 3247965 4624894 14638301 0.5718 1857035
TOTAL 10469450


The Net NPV after 4 years is 456043

(10469450 - 10013407 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013407) -10013407 - -
Year 1 3449619 -6563788 3449619 0.8333 2874683
Year 2 3970459 -2593329 7420078 0.6944 2757263
Year 3 3970258 1376929 11390336 0.5787 2297603
Year 4 3247965 4624894 14638301 0.4823 1566341
TOTAL 9495890


The Net NPV after 4 years is -517517

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9495890 - 10013407 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Formal Communication to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Formal Communication has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Formal Communication can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Formal Communication, then the stock price of the Formal Communication should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Formal Communication should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of When Communication Should Be Formal

References & Further Readings

Antti Tenhiala, Fabrizio Salvador (2018), "When Communication Should Be Formal Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Baker Technology Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Mogo Finance Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Forebase Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Yeo Hiap Seng Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Nonalcoholic)


Valeo SA SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Future Data SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Northwest Natural Gas SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Natural Gas Utilities


Zigexn SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services