Bretton Woods and the Financial Crisis of 1971 (A) and (B) (Abridged) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Bretton Woods and the Financial Crisis of 1971 (A) and (B) (Abridged) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Bretton Woods and the Financial Crisis of 1971 (A) and (B) (Abridged) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Robert F. Bruner. The Bretton Woods and the Financial Crisis of 1971 (A) and (B) (Abridged) (referred as “Bretton Woods” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial management, Financial markets, International business, Policy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Bretton Woods and the Financial Crisis of 1971 (A) and (B) (Abridged) Case Study

"In August 1971, President Richard Nixon had to decide how to respond to a growing "run" on the US dollar. Declining confidence in the dollar had led some national trading partners to redeem dollars for gold at the US Treasury's gold window. In the Bretton Woods system, the US dollar was the world's reserve currency. To supply sufficient money to accommodate growth in the global economy, the United States would inevitably run deficits in its balance of payments-which would ultimately force it to devalue its currency. The Bretton Woods system seemed engineered to fail. Nixon's two dominant policy alternatives were (a) do nothing; and (b) devalue the dollar by abandoning the commitment under the Bretton Woods Agreement to convert dollars into gold at $35/ounce. Students must assess the situation and recommend a course of action. The A case describes the Bretton Woods system, the run on the dollar, and Nixon's policy dilemma. The B case gives the text of Nixon's 1971 address outlining his New Economic Policy. The A and B abridged case shortens the total presentation by eliminating some of the quoted material; the student task in this case is to analyze Nixon's decision and decide on next steps. The C case presents a brief epilogue.

Case Authors : Robert F. Bruner

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Financial management, Financial markets, International business, Policy

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Bretton Woods and the Financial Crisis of 1971 (A) and (B) (Abridged) Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10013187)	-10013187	-	-
Year 1	3471100	-6542087	3471100	0.9434	3274623
Year 2	3974490	-2567597	7445590	0.89	3537282
Year 3	3936745	1369148	11382335	0.8396	3305367
Year 4	3230357	4599505	14612692	0.7921	2558745
TOTAL			14612692		12676017

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2662830

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Bretton Woods have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Bretton Woods shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Bretton Woods and the Financial Crisis of 1971 (A) and (B) (Abridged)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Bretton Woods often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Bretton Woods needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10013187)	-10013187	-	-
Year 1	3471100	-6542087	3471100	0.8696	3018348
Year 2	3974490	-2567597	7445590	0.7561	3005285
Year 3	3936745	1369148	11382335	0.6575	2588474
Year 4	3230357	4599505	14612692	0.5718	1846967
TOTAL					10459074

The Net NPV after 4 years is 445887

(10459074 - 10013187 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10013187)	-10013187	-	-
Year 1	3471100	-6542087	3471100	0.8333	2892583
Year 2	3974490	-2567597	7445590	0.6944	2760063
Year 3	3936745	1369148	11382335	0.5787	2278209
Year 4	3230357	4599505	14612692	0.4823	1557850
TOTAL					9488704

The Net NPV after 4 years is -524483

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9488704 - 10013187 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Bretton Woods to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Bretton Woods has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Bretton Woods can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Bretton Woods, then the stock price of the Bretton Woods should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Bretton Woods should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Bretton Woods and the Financial Crisis of 1971 (A) and (B) (Abridged)

References & Further Readings

Robert F. Bruner (2018), "Bretton Woods and the Financial Crisis of 1971 (A) and (B) (Abridged) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.