×




Berkshire Partners: Purchase of Rival Company (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Berkshire Partners: Purchase of Rival Company (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Berkshire Partners: Purchase of Rival Company (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Nabil N. El-Hage, Andre Baillargeon, Stephen Parks. The Berkshire Partners: Purchase of Rival Company (A) (referred as “Holmes Berkshire” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial management, Mergers & acquisitions.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Berkshire Partners: Purchase of Rival Company (A) Case Study


Berkshire Partners, a private equity firm in Boston, was pleased with their recent investment in the Holmes Group, a home comfort consumer electronics company. The portfolio company was exceeding key financial targets and Berkshire Partners was confident that it would be another successful investment. Holmes' management team then suggested acquiring a kitchen electronics company, the Rival Company. The management of Holmes believed that Rival would complement their existing portfolio of products and it was the perfect time to buy due to a depressed stock price caused by declining earnings. The investment team at Berkshire now had to decide if the possible returns from an investment in Rival were enough to risk the successful investment in Holmes, or if Rival could be acquired without risking Berkshire's investment in Holmes.


Case Authors : Nabil N. El-Hage, Andre Baillargeon, Stephen Parks

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Financial management, Mergers & acquisitions




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Berkshire Partners: Purchase of Rival Company (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019332) -10019332 - -
Year 1 3459885 -6559447 3459885 0.9434 3264042
Year 2 3964786 -2594661 7424671 0.89 3528645
Year 3 3945216 1350555 11369887 0.8396 3312479
Year 4 3228792 4579347 14598679 0.7921 2557506
TOTAL 14598679 12662673




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2643341

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Holmes Berkshire shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Holmes Berkshire have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Berkshire Partners: Purchase of Rival Company (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Holmes Berkshire often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Holmes Berkshire needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019332) -10019332 - -
Year 1 3459885 -6559447 3459885 0.8696 3008596
Year 2 3964786 -2594661 7424671 0.7561 2997948
Year 3 3945216 1350555 11369887 0.6575 2594044
Year 4 3228792 4579347 14598679 0.5718 1846072
TOTAL 10446659


The Net NPV after 4 years is 427327

(10446659 - 10019332 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019332) -10019332 - -
Year 1 3459885 -6559447 3459885 0.8333 2883238
Year 2 3964786 -2594661 7424671 0.6944 2753324
Year 3 3945216 1350555 11369887 0.5787 2283111
Year 4 3228792 4579347 14598679 0.4823 1557095
TOTAL 9476767


The Net NPV after 4 years is -542565

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9476767 - 10019332 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Holmes Berkshire to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Holmes Berkshire has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Holmes Berkshire can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Holmes Berkshire, then the stock price of the Holmes Berkshire should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Holmes Berkshire should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Berkshire Partners: Purchase of Rival Company (A)

References & Further Readings

Nabil N. El-Hage, Andre Baillargeon, Stephen Parks (2018), "Berkshire Partners: Purchase of Rival Company (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Klovern AB SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Coeur Mining SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Great Wall Belt SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Atlas Arteria SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Befesa SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Trucking


Maeda Kosen Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


ASX SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Monks SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


N Field Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Extendicare Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities