×




DVMS Power Electronics Private Limited: Capacity Analysis Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for DVMS Power Electronics Private Limited: Capacity Analysis case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. DVMS Power Electronics Private Limited: Capacity Analysis case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Kedar Joshi, Vasanth Kamath VP, Mohnish Gulve. The DVMS Power Electronics Private Limited: Capacity Analysis (referred as “Dvms Capacity” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Economy, Manufacturing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of DVMS Power Electronics Private Limited: Capacity Analysis Case Study


In 2016, the deputy general manager of operations at DVMS Power Electronics Private Limited (DVMS) in Gujarat, India, was faced with a problem at the company's transformer plant. In recent years, amidst growing demand, the company had experienced low manufacturing capacity and was often unable to fill customer orders. Various stakeholders expressed their concerns about failing service levels. The deputy general manager was considering additional capacity as an option, but simply adding such capacity might negatively affect DVMS' cost structure. He needed to consider the various short- and long-term options that would best benefit the company. He assigned the company's summer intern the task of collecting the required data regarding the manufacturing of transformers at DVMS: the specified number of machines and workers, the processing time, and the monthly demand data for transformers. He needed to prepare a report that identified weak areas and suggested possible ways to expand capacity. Kedar P. Joshi, Vasanth Kamath VP, and Mohnish Gulve are affiliated with T.A. Pai Management Institute.


Case Authors : Kedar Joshi, Vasanth Kamath VP, Mohnish Gulve

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Economy, Manufacturing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for DVMS Power Electronics Private Limited: Capacity Analysis Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004825) -10004825 - -
Year 1 3444139 -6560686 3444139 0.9434 3249188
Year 2 3972325 -2588361 7416464 0.89 3535355
Year 3 3962189 1373828 11378653 0.8396 3326730
Year 4 3243104 4616932 14621757 0.7921 2568842
TOTAL 14621757 12680115




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2675290

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Dvms Capacity have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Dvms Capacity shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of DVMS Power Electronics Private Limited: Capacity Analysis

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Dvms Capacity often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Dvms Capacity needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004825) -10004825 - -
Year 1 3444139 -6560686 3444139 0.8696 2994903
Year 2 3972325 -2588361 7416464 0.7561 3003648
Year 3 3962189 1373828 11378653 0.6575 2605204
Year 4 3243104 4616932 14621757 0.5718 1854255
TOTAL 10458011


The Net NPV after 4 years is 453186

(10458011 - 10004825 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004825) -10004825 - -
Year 1 3444139 -6560686 3444139 0.8333 2870116
Year 2 3972325 -2588361 7416464 0.6944 2758559
Year 3 3962189 1373828 11378653 0.5787 2292933
Year 4 3243104 4616932 14621757 0.4823 1563997
TOTAL 9485605


The Net NPV after 4 years is -519220

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9485605 - 10004825 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Dvms Capacity to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Dvms Capacity has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Dvms Capacity can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Dvms Capacity, then the stock price of the Dvms Capacity should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Dvms Capacity should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of DVMS Power Electronics Private Limited: Capacity Analysis

References & Further Readings

Kedar Joshi, Vasanth Kamath VP, Mohnish Gulve (2018), "DVMS Power Electronics Private Limited: Capacity Analysis Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


SilverBow SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Energiser SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Oriental Yuhong A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Arcotech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Chamberlin SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Iron & Steel


Nozawa SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


SKIL Infrastructure Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services