×




DVMS Power Electronics Private Limited: Capacity Analysis Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for DVMS Power Electronics Private Limited: Capacity Analysis case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. DVMS Power Electronics Private Limited: Capacity Analysis case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Kedar Joshi, Vasanth Kamath VP, Mohnish Gulve. The DVMS Power Electronics Private Limited: Capacity Analysis (referred as “Dvms Capacity” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Economy, Manufacturing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of DVMS Power Electronics Private Limited: Capacity Analysis Case Study


In 2016, the deputy general manager of operations at DVMS Power Electronics Private Limited (DVMS) in Gujarat, India, was faced with a problem at the company's transformer plant. In recent years, amidst growing demand, the company had experienced low manufacturing capacity and was often unable to fill customer orders. Various stakeholders expressed their concerns about failing service levels. The deputy general manager was considering additional capacity as an option, but simply adding such capacity might negatively affect DVMS' cost structure. He needed to consider the various short- and long-term options that would best benefit the company. He assigned the company's summer intern the task of collecting the required data regarding the manufacturing of transformers at DVMS: the specified number of machines and workers, the processing time, and the monthly demand data for transformers. He needed to prepare a report that identified weak areas and suggested possible ways to expand capacity. Kedar P. Joshi, Vasanth Kamath VP, and Mohnish Gulve are affiliated with T.A. Pai Management Institute.


Case Authors : Kedar Joshi, Vasanth Kamath VP, Mohnish Gulve

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Economy, Manufacturing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for DVMS Power Electronics Private Limited: Capacity Analysis Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007207) -10007207 - -
Year 1 3463993 -6543214 3463993 0.9434 3267918
Year 2 3979514 -2563700 7443507 0.89 3541753
Year 3 3975063 1411363 11418570 0.8396 3337540
Year 4 3248169 4659532 14666739 0.7921 2572854
TOTAL 14666739 12720065




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2712858

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Dvms Capacity shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Dvms Capacity have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of DVMS Power Electronics Private Limited: Capacity Analysis

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Dvms Capacity often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Dvms Capacity needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007207) -10007207 - -
Year 1 3463993 -6543214 3463993 0.8696 3012168
Year 2 3979514 -2563700 7443507 0.7561 3009084
Year 3 3975063 1411363 11418570 0.6575 2613668
Year 4 3248169 4659532 14666739 0.5718 1857151
TOTAL 10492072


The Net NPV after 4 years is 484865

(10492072 - 10007207 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007207) -10007207 - -
Year 1 3463993 -6543214 3463993 0.8333 2886661
Year 2 3979514 -2563700 7443507 0.6944 2763551
Year 3 3975063 1411363 11418570 0.5787 2300384
Year 4 3248169 4659532 14666739 0.4823 1566440
TOTAL 9517035


The Net NPV after 4 years is -490172

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9517035 - 10007207 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Dvms Capacity to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Dvms Capacity has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Dvms Capacity can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Dvms Capacity, then the stock price of the Dvms Capacity should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Dvms Capacity should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of DVMS Power Electronics Private Limited: Capacity Analysis

References & Further Readings

Kedar Joshi, Vasanth Kamath VP, Mohnish Gulve (2018), "DVMS Power Electronics Private Limited: Capacity Analysis Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Motrex SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Yoke Technology A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Yeong Hwa Meta SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Singlepoint Inc. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


PNpoongnyun SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


JEP SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Nakama SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services