×




Microfinance Ecosystem: How Connectors, Interactors, and Institutionalizers Co-Create Value Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Microfinance Ecosystem: How Connectors, Interactors, and Institutionalizers Co-Create Value case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Microfinance Ecosystem: How Connectors, Interactors, and Institutionalizers Co-Create Value case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Kelly Armstrong, Mujtaba Ahsan, Chamu Sundaramurthy. The Microfinance Ecosystem: How Connectors, Interactors, and Institutionalizers Co-Create Value (referred as “Mfis Institutionalizers” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, International business.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Microfinance Ecosystem: How Connectors, Interactors, and Institutionalizers Co-Create Value Case Study


Since the mid-1990s, the number of microfinance institutions (MFIs) has grown tremendously, with more than 10,000 worldwide varying in size and approach. Despite their continued growth and variety, the value of MFIs has been hotly debated. Furthermore, managers and founders of MFIs have also faced the challenge of balancing social and financial objectives and understanding effective ways of evaluating their organization's effectiveness. Hence, in this article we closely examine the operations of three distinct types of MFIs and offer a framework of how they collectively create value, with each playing a unique role in a symbiotic relationship: Namaste, an interactor; Kiva, a connector; and Accion, an institutionalizer. Interactors build relationships with clients and facilitate the flow of information to connectors and institutionalizers that disseminate this data to capital markets, build confidence, and fuel capital flow into the MF industry. The latter disseminates innovation and best practices. Thus, it is critical that each MFI recognizes its symbiotic role and evaluate itself accordingly instead of spreading itself across roles.


Case Authors : Kelly Armstrong, Mujtaba Ahsan, Chamu Sundaramurthy

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : International business




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Microfinance Ecosystem: How Connectors, Interactors, and Institutionalizers Co-Create Value Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015605) -10015605 - -
Year 1 3445197 -6570408 3445197 0.9434 3250186
Year 2 3974080 -2596328 7419277 0.89 3536917
Year 3 3949158 1352830 11368435 0.8396 3315789
Year 4 3232542 4585372 14600977 0.7921 2560476
TOTAL 14600977 12663368




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2647763

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Mfis Institutionalizers shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Mfis Institutionalizers have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Microfinance Ecosystem: How Connectors, Interactors, and Institutionalizers Co-Create Value

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Mfis Institutionalizers often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Mfis Institutionalizers needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015605) -10015605 - -
Year 1 3445197 -6570408 3445197 0.8696 2995823
Year 2 3974080 -2596328 7419277 0.7561 3004975
Year 3 3949158 1352830 11368435 0.6575 2596635
Year 4 3232542 4585372 14600977 0.5718 1848216
TOTAL 10445651


The Net NPV after 4 years is 430046

(10445651 - 10015605 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015605) -10015605 - -
Year 1 3445197 -6570408 3445197 0.8333 2870998
Year 2 3974080 -2596328 7419277 0.6944 2759778
Year 3 3949158 1352830 11368435 0.5787 2285392
Year 4 3232542 4585372 14600977 0.4823 1558903
TOTAL 9475071


The Net NPV after 4 years is -540534

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9475071 - 10015605 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Mfis Institutionalizers to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Mfis Institutionalizers has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Mfis Institutionalizers can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Mfis Institutionalizers, then the stock price of the Mfis Institutionalizers should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Mfis Institutionalizers should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Microfinance Ecosystem: How Connectors, Interactors, and Institutionalizers Co-Create Value

References & Further Readings

Kelly Armstrong, Mujtaba Ahsan, Chamu Sundaramurthy (2018), "Microfinance Ecosystem: How Connectors, Interactors, and Institutionalizers Co-Create Value Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


New Gold SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


FSD Pharma B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Allianz ADR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Life)


Seres Therapeutics Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


LCI Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Mobile Homes & RVs


1414 Degrees SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Kyodo Paper SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Office Supplies


Novus Holdings Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Israel Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations