×




Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by George Athanassakos, Dan Buffery. The Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. (referred as “Aem Dcf” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial analysis, Financial management, Financial markets.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. Case Study


The senior portfolio manager at National Securities Inc. (National) is concerned about the recent decline in shares of Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd (AEM), a Canadian gold producer with several years of precious metals mining experience that was considered one of the portfolio's strongest performers. The senior portfolio manager and his team recently spent time at one of AEM's mines and believed in the operational potential of the company. National's research department had prepared free cash flow forecasts for AEM, which the senior portfolio manager reviewed and modified, following their visit with the company. He knew that despite his team's belief in the future prospects of AEM, the stock may have become overvalued from a fundamental view point. The senior portfolio manager asked his team to perform a fundamental valuation of the equity of AEM. As normally, this meant the team would use the discounted cash flow (DCF) methodology, with financial assumptions that had been carefully examined. However, he knew that DCF valuation would likely undervalue resource companies, such as AEM, as the DCF valuation tended to overlook the flexibility provided at decision nodes during the life of the company with regards to extracting commodities from the ground. As a result, the senior portfolio manager reminded the team that the DCF method, when applied to a mining company, had to be expanded to explicitly include the value of the unmined metals. The underground unmined gold would need to be valued as a real option, using an adjusted Black-Scholes model.


Case Authors : George Athanassakos, Dan Buffery

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Financial analysis, Financial management, Financial markets




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10008131) -10008131 - -
Year 1 3458344 -6549787 3458344 0.9434 3262589
Year 2 3964988 -2584799 7423332 0.89 3528825
Year 3 3966290 1381491 11389622 0.8396 3330174
Year 4 3237519 4619010 14627141 0.7921 2564418
TOTAL 14627141 12686006




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2677875

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Aem Dcf shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Aem Dcf have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd.

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Aem Dcf often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Aem Dcf needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10008131) -10008131 - -
Year 1 3458344 -6549787 3458344 0.8696 3007256
Year 2 3964988 -2584799 7423332 0.7561 2998101
Year 3 3966290 1381491 11389622 0.6575 2607900
Year 4 3237519 4619010 14627141 0.5718 1851062
TOTAL 10464318


The Net NPV after 4 years is 456187

(10464318 - 10008131 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10008131) -10008131 - -
Year 1 3458344 -6549787 3458344 0.8333 2881953
Year 2 3964988 -2584799 7423332 0.6944 2753464
Year 3 3966290 1381491 11389622 0.5787 2295307
Year 4 3237519 4619010 14627141 0.4823 1561304
TOTAL 9492027


The Net NPV after 4 years is -516104

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9492027 - 10008131 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Aem Dcf to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Aem Dcf has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Aem Dcf can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Aem Dcf, then the stock price of the Aem Dcf should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Aem Dcf should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd.

References & Further Readings

George Athanassakos, Dan Buffery (2018), "Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Manho Rope&Wir SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Huvis SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


Shenzhen Wongtee Int SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Drive Shack SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Recreational Activities


Hexin Industry A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


Handysoft SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Samyoung M Tek SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Orient Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Amperex Tech A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls