×




The Dakota Access Pipeline Project Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for The Dakota Access Pipeline Project case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The Dakota Access Pipeline Project case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ingo Walter, Sinziana Dorobantu. The The Dakota Access Pipeline Project (referred as “Pipeline Faculities” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, International business, Project management, Risk management, Social responsibility.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of The Dakota Access Pipeline Project Case Study


Plans for a $3.5 billion crude oil pipeline in 2014-17 from the Bakken formation of North Sakota and Canada to a transfer point near Chicago, linked to an existing pipeline to the major refining and export faculities on the US Gulf Coast, run into trouble when the developer, Energy Transfer Partners, encounters a "roadblock" on a section of federal land that is within a reservation of the Flat Rock Sioux tribe of Native Americans. The case charts how the conflict escalated from the local to the global level.


Case Authors : Ingo Walter, Sinziana Dorobantu

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : International business, Project management, Risk management, Social responsibility




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for The Dakota Access Pipeline Project Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029381) -10029381 - -
Year 1 3449297 -6580084 3449297 0.9434 3254054
Year 2 3957676 -2622408 7406973 0.89 3522318
Year 3 3957468 1335060 11364441 0.8396 3322766
Year 4 3228070 4563130 14592511 0.7921 2556934
TOTAL 14592511 12656072




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2626691

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Pipeline Faculities have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Pipeline Faculities shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of The Dakota Access Pipeline Project

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Pipeline Faculities often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Pipeline Faculities needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029381) -10029381 - -
Year 1 3449297 -6580084 3449297 0.8696 2999389
Year 2 3957676 -2622408 7406973 0.7561 2992572
Year 3 3957468 1335060 11364441 0.6575 2602099
Year 4 3228070 4563130 14592511 0.5718 1845659
TOTAL 10439719


The Net NPV after 4 years is 410338

(10439719 - 10029381 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029381) -10029381 - -
Year 1 3449297 -6580084 3449297 0.8333 2874414
Year 2 3957676 -2622408 7406973 0.6944 2748386
Year 3 3957468 1335060 11364441 0.5787 2290201
Year 4 3228070 4563130 14592511 0.4823 1556747
TOTAL 9469748


The Net NPV after 4 years is -559633

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9469748 - 10029381 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Pipeline Faculities to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Pipeline Faculities has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Pipeline Faculities can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Pipeline Faculities, then the stock price of the Pipeline Faculities should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Pipeline Faculities should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of The Dakota Access Pipeline Project

References & Further Readings

Ingo Walter, Sinziana Dorobantu (2018), "The Dakota Access Pipeline Project Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


LionGold Corp Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Sh E & C SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


TAFI Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Furniture & Fixtures


Maabarot SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Enomoto SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Hatsuho Shouji SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Vivimed Labs Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


RM Drip Sprinklers SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


Iofina SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Itochu Corp. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Morningstar SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services