×




Asahi Kasei: Building an Inclusive Value Chain in India Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Asahi Kasei: Building an Inclusive Value Chain in India case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Asahi Kasei: Building an Inclusive Value Chain in India case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Savita Shankar, Masahiro Okada. The Asahi Kasei: Building an Inclusive Value Chain in India (referred as “Kasei Asahi” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Social responsibility.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Asahi Kasei: Building an Inclusive Value Chain in India Case Study


Asahi Kasei Corporation (Asahi Kasei), a diversified company based in Japan, had partnerships with weavers in India for its cupro yarn, which was used to make traditional garments for Indian women. The company developed a unique, inclusive value chain in India and began focusing on enhancing the development impact of its operations there. With a growing market for cupro yarn in India, Asahi Kasei expanded the capacity of its production facility in Japan in 2014, even though the domestic market for the product was shrinking. However, in 2015, the product started to face intense price competition in India from viscose rayon, which was an inferior but cheaper product. In 2016, the company had to address the competitive pressures while considering its economic and social objectives. Savita Shankar is affiliated with Keio University. Masahiro Okada is affiliated with KEIO Business School.


Case Authors : Savita Shankar, Masahiro Okada

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Social responsibility




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Asahi Kasei: Building an Inclusive Value Chain in India Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004842) -10004842 - -
Year 1 3464642 -6540200 3464642 0.9434 3268530
Year 2 3977614 -2562586 7442256 0.89 3540062
Year 3 3954860 1392274 11397116 0.8396 3320577
Year 4 3239978 4632252 14637094 0.7921 2566366
TOTAL 14637094 12695535




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2690693

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Kasei Asahi have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Kasei Asahi shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Asahi Kasei: Building an Inclusive Value Chain in India

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Kasei Asahi often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Kasei Asahi needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004842) -10004842 - -
Year 1 3464642 -6540200 3464642 0.8696 3012732
Year 2 3977614 -2562586 7442256 0.7561 3007648
Year 3 3954860 1392274 11397116 0.6575 2600385
Year 4 3239978 4632252 14637094 0.5718 1852468
TOTAL 10473232


The Net NPV after 4 years is 468390

(10473232 - 10004842 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004842) -10004842 - -
Year 1 3464642 -6540200 3464642 0.8333 2887202
Year 2 3977614 -2562586 7442256 0.6944 2762232
Year 3 3954860 1392274 11397116 0.5787 2288692
Year 4 3239978 4632252 14637094 0.4823 1562489
TOTAL 9500615


The Net NPV after 4 years is -504227

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9500615 - 10004842 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Kasei Asahi to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Kasei Asahi has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Kasei Asahi can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Kasei Asahi, then the stock price of the Kasei Asahi should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Kasei Asahi should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Asahi Kasei: Building an Inclusive Value Chain in India

References & Further Readings

Savita Shankar, Masahiro Okada (2018), "Asahi Kasei: Building an Inclusive Value Chain in India Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Abbey SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


TELUS Corporation SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Urja Global SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


State Bank SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Enterprise Diversified SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services