×




Reexamining Dual-Class Stock Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Reexamining Dual-Class Stock case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Reexamining Dual-Class Stock case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Vijay Govindarajan, Anup Srivastava. The Reexamining Dual-Class Stock (referred as “Dual Class” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Corporate governance, Currency, Financial management, Financial markets.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Reexamining Dual-Class Stock Case Study


Snapchat's initial public offering, which provided shares with no voting rights, is a culmination of the growing trend of dual-class shares. It contradicts the precept of one-share, one-vote that is essential for corporate democracy. Snapchat's action caused an uproar among influential investors. In January 2017, a coalition of the world's biggest money managers, which together control more than $17 trillion in assets, demanded a total ban on dual-class shares. We reason that the increasing prominence of dual-class stock is explained by the confluence of three economic trends: the growing importance of intangible investments, the rise of activist investors, and the decline of staggered boards and poison pills. A dual-class structure offers immunity against proxy contests initiated by short-term investors. It enables managers to ignore capital market pressures and to avoid myopic actions such as cutting research and development, which hurt companies in the long term. Thus, a dual-class structure is optimal in certain scenarios. We put forth alternatives to dual-class structure that enable managers to maintain control while retaining focus on sustainable value creation.


Case Authors : Vijay Govindarajan, Anup Srivastava

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Corporate governance, Currency, Financial management, Financial markets




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Reexamining Dual-Class Stock Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020214) -10020214 - -
Year 1 3463051 -6557163 3463051 0.9434 3267029
Year 2 3955448 -2601715 7418499 0.89 3520335
Year 3 3969424 1367709 11387923 0.8396 3332805
Year 4 3250294 4618003 14638217 0.7921 2574537
TOTAL 14638217 12694706




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2674492

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Dual Class shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Dual Class have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Reexamining Dual-Class Stock

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Dual Class often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Dual Class needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020214) -10020214 - -
Year 1 3463051 -6557163 3463051 0.8696 3011349
Year 2 3955448 -2601715 7418499 0.7561 2990887
Year 3 3969424 1367709 11387923 0.6575 2609961
Year 4 3250294 4618003 14638217 0.5718 1858366
TOTAL 10470563


The Net NPV after 4 years is 450349

(10470563 - 10020214 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020214) -10020214 - -
Year 1 3463051 -6557163 3463051 0.8333 2885876
Year 2 3955448 -2601715 7418499 0.6944 2746839
Year 3 3969424 1367709 11387923 0.5787 2297120
Year 4 3250294 4618003 14638217 0.4823 1567464
TOTAL 9497299


The Net NPV after 4 years is -522915

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9497299 - 10020214 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Dual Class to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Dual Class has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Dual Class can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Dual Class, then the stock price of the Dual Class should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Dual Class should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Reexamining Dual-Class Stock

References & Further Readings

Vijay Govindarajan, Anup Srivastava (2018), "Reexamining Dual-Class Stock Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Superior Energy Services SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Sanyodo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)


Hakuten SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Recreational Activities


Sekichu SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Home Improvement)


CSR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Rational AG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Nitto Boseki SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Roland DG Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Peripherals


Sg SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Maabarot SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing