Goldman Sachs (A): Determining the Potential of Social Impact Bonds Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Goldman Sachs (A): Determining the Potential of Social Impact Bonds case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Goldman Sachs (A): Determining the Potential of Social Impact Bonds case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Andrew Hoffman. The Goldman Sachs (A): Determining the Potential of Social Impact Bonds (referred as “Goldman Glen” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Social enterprise, Social responsibility.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Goldman Sachs (A): Determining the Potential of Social Impact Bonds Case Study

Head of Goldman Sachs' Urban Investment Group Alicia Glen will be making the case for creating a social impact bond (SIB) tomorrow. Proposed by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg as an investment that will decrease adolescent incarceration rates, the SIB would be the first of its kind in the U.S. Goldman would have a first-mover advantage if it chooses to take part in the project, but it carries significant risk - the bank would be operating in an environment that is traditionally government and non-profit territory. Glen wondered if Goldman should invest only if a philanthropy, such as Bloomberg Philanthropies, would secure a portion of the loan. She also wondered if the transaction costs would be too high or if there were any legal or political hurdles on the horizon to stall implementation. Students are asked to gain an understanding of social investments and construct a 2X2 matrix to assess expectations for returns on social and financial impact.

Case Authors : Andrew Hoffman

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Social enterprise, Social responsibility

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Goldman Sachs (A): Determining the Potential of Social Impact Bonds Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10008324)	-10008324	-	-
Year 1	3453678	-6554646	3453678	0.9434	3258187
Year 2	3964021	-2590625	7417699	0.89	3527965
Year 3	3947189	1356564	11364888	0.8396	3314136
Year 4	3231748	4588312	14596636	0.7921	2559847
TOTAL			14596636		12660134

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2651810

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Goldman Glen have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Goldman Glen shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Goldman Sachs (A): Determining the Potential of Social Impact Bonds

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Goldman Glen often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Goldman Glen needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10008324)	-10008324	-	-
Year 1	3453678	-6554646	3453678	0.8696	3003198
Year 2	3964021	-2590625	7417699	0.7561	2997369
Year 3	3947189	1356564	11364888	0.6575	2595341
Year 4	3231748	4588312	14596636	0.5718	1847762
TOTAL					10443671

The Net NPV after 4 years is 435347

(10443671 - 10008324 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10008324)	-10008324	-	-
Year 1	3453678	-6554646	3453678	0.8333	2878065
Year 2	3964021	-2590625	7417699	0.6944	2752792
Year 3	3947189	1356564	11364888	0.5787	2284253
Year 4	3231748	4588312	14596636	0.4823	1558520
TOTAL					9473631

The Net NPV after 4 years is -534693

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9473631 - 10008324 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Goldman Glen to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Goldman Glen has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Goldman Glen can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Goldman Glen, then the stock price of the Goldman Glen should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Goldman Glen should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Goldman Sachs (A): Determining the Potential of Social Impact Bonds

References & Further Readings

Andrew Hoffman (2018), "Goldman Sachs (A): Determining the Potential of Social Impact Bonds Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.