Valuing a Microfinance Institution (Or Private Growth Enterprise): Dealing with Uncertainty Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Valuing a Microfinance Institution (Or Private Growth Enterprise): Dealing with Uncertainty case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Valuing a Microfinance Institution (Or Private Growth Enterprise): Dealing with Uncertainty case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Sean Foote, Brian Busch. The Valuing a Microfinance Institution (Or Private Growth Enterprise): Dealing with Uncertainty (referred as “Microfinance Methodology” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Valuing a Microfinance Institution (Or Private Growth Enterprise): Dealing with Uncertainty Case Study

University of California, Berkeley-Haas collectionThe Valuing a Microfinance Institution (Or Private Growth Enterprise) case study provides students with a scenario where they can learn how to evaluate and value a microfinance investment target in Africa amidst high uncertainty, limited information, and few (if any) usable comparable companies. Even though the case study focuses on an MFI, it can easily be applied to all private growth enterprises. Given high forecast growth, an uncertain exit, diverse competition, and no standard methodology, the protagonist of the case must choose between five different valuation techniques. The case explores the pros and cons of each methodology; students will choose a methodology, derive a valuation, discuss how the techniques lead to a wide range of values, and finally understand the difference between calculating a valuation and making an offer during a negotiation.

Case Authors : Sean Foote, Brian Busch

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Financial management

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Valuing a Microfinance Institution (Or Private Growth Enterprise): Dealing with Uncertainty Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10029771)	-10029771	-	-
Year 1	3455424	-6574347	3455424	0.9434	3259834
Year 2	3967789	-2606558	7423213	0.89	3531318
Year 3	3968129	1361571	11391342	0.8396	3331718
Year 4	3249650	4611221	14640992	0.7921	2574027
TOTAL			14640992		12696897

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2667126

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Microfinance Methodology have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Microfinance Methodology shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Valuing a Microfinance Institution (Or Private Growth Enterprise): Dealing with Uncertainty

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Microfinance Methodology often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Microfinance Methodology needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10029771)	-10029771	-	-
Year 1	3455424	-6574347	3455424	0.8696	3004717
Year 2	3967789	-2606558	7423213	0.7561	3000219
Year 3	3968129	1361571	11391342	0.6575	2609109
Year 4	3249650	4611221	14640992	0.5718	1857998
TOTAL					10472042

The Net NPV after 4 years is 442271

(10472042 - 10029771 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10029771)	-10029771	-	-
Year 1	3455424	-6574347	3455424	0.8333	2879520
Year 2	3967789	-2606558	7423213	0.6944	2755409
Year 3	3968129	1361571	11391342	0.5787	2296371
Year 4	3249650	4611221	14640992	0.4823	1567154
TOTAL					9498454

The Net NPV after 4 years is -531317

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9498454 - 10029771 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Microfinance Methodology to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Microfinance Methodology has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Microfinance Methodology can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Microfinance Methodology, then the stock price of the Microfinance Methodology should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Microfinance Methodology should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Valuing a Microfinance Institution (Or Private Growth Enterprise): Dealing with Uncertainty

References & Further Readings

Sean Foote, Brian Busch (2018), "Valuing a Microfinance Institution (Or Private Growth Enterprise): Dealing with Uncertainty Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.