×




Ford Motor Company: Accounting for Deferred Taxes Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Ford Motor Company: Accounting for Deferred Taxes case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Ford Motor Company: Accounting for Deferred Taxes case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Darren Henderson, Christine Liu. The Ford Motor Company: Accounting for Deferred Taxes (referred as “Ford Deferred” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Communication, Financial analysis.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Ford Motor Company: Accounting for Deferred Taxes Case Study


Ford Motor Company (Ford) is considering whether to reverse the valuation allowance it has recorded over its deferred tax assets. Due to substantial losses from 2006 to 2008, Ford has $10.3 billion of tax loss carryforwards in addition to other deferred tax assets; however, due to uncertainty, Ford has not recorded the value of those deferred tax assets on its balance sheet. In light of improving business conditions over 2009 and 2010, Ford must now decide whether it is "more likely than not" to realize the value of its deferred tax assets and reverse the $15.7 billion valuation allowance it has recorded. If reversed, Ford must also decide how to present the change in valuation in its financial statements.


Case Authors : Darren Henderson, Christine Liu

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Communication, Financial analysis




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Ford Motor Company: Accounting for Deferred Taxes Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016788) -10016788 - -
Year 1 3444338 -6572450 3444338 0.9434 3249375
Year 2 3960575 -2611875 7404913 0.89 3524898
Year 3 3942439 1330564 11347352 0.8396 3310148
Year 4 3250357 4580921 14597709 0.7921 2574587
TOTAL 14597709 12659008




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2642220

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Ford Deferred have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Ford Deferred shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Ford Motor Company: Accounting for Deferred Taxes

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Ford Deferred often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Ford Deferred needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016788) -10016788 - -
Year 1 3444338 -6572450 3444338 0.8696 2995077
Year 2 3960575 -2611875 7404913 0.7561 2994764
Year 3 3942439 1330564 11347352 0.6575 2592218
Year 4 3250357 4580921 14597709 0.5718 1858402
TOTAL 10440460


The Net NPV after 4 years is 423672

(10440460 - 10016788 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016788) -10016788 - -
Year 1 3444338 -6572450 3444338 0.8333 2870282
Year 2 3960575 -2611875 7404913 0.6944 2750399
Year 3 3942439 1330564 11347352 0.5787 2281504
Year 4 3250357 4580921 14597709 0.4823 1567495
TOTAL 9469680


The Net NPV after 4 years is -547108

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9469680 - 10016788 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Ford Deferred to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Ford Deferred has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Ford Deferred can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Ford Deferred, then the stock price of the Ford Deferred should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Ford Deferred should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Ford Motor Company: Accounting for Deferred Taxes

References & Further Readings

Darren Henderson, Christine Liu (2018), "Ford Motor Company: Accounting for Deferred Taxes Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Marketing Worldwide SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


Kodama Chemical Industry SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Mothercare SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Apparel)


Huisheng Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Fish/Livestock


Great Wall Pan Asia SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Seoul Food SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Hardide SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


MRV ON SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Ingersoll-Rand SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


China Sanjiang Fine Chemicals SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing