×




Basel II: Assessing the Default and Loss Characteristics of Project Finance Loans (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Basel II: Assessing the Default and Loss Characteristics of Project Finance Loans (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Basel II: Assessing the Default and Loss Characteristics of Project Finance Loans (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Benjamin C. Esty, Aldo Sesia. The Basel II: Assessing the Default and Loss Characteristics of Project Finance Loans (A) (referred as “Loans Basel” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Negotiations, Project management, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Basel II: Assessing the Default and Loss Characteristics of Project Finance Loans (A) Case Study


In June 1999, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision announced plans to revise the capital standards for banks. The Basel Committee believed that project loans were significantly riskier than corporate loans and, therefore, warranted higher capital charges under the new proposal (known as Basel II). Bankers, fearing that higher capital charges would damage project lending by lowering profits and driving borrowers to nonbank competitors, formed a consortium to oppose the proposal by studying the actual default and loss characteristics of their combined portfolios of project loans. The study showed that project loans were not riskier than corporate loans. Armed with this data, the consortium sent a letter to the Basel Committee in August 2002 urging them to lower the proposed capital charges on project finance loans.


Case Authors : Benjamin C. Esty, Aldo Sesia

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Negotiations, Project management, Risk management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Basel II: Assessing the Default and Loss Characteristics of Project Finance Loans (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10008389) -10008389 - -
Year 1 3472280 -6536109 3472280 0.9434 3275736
Year 2 3956231 -2579878 7428511 0.89 3521032
Year 3 3958266 1378388 11386777 0.8396 3323436
Year 4 3232024 4610412 14618801 0.7921 2560066
TOTAL 14618801 12680270




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2671881

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Loans Basel shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Loans Basel have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Basel II: Assessing the Default and Loss Characteristics of Project Finance Loans (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Loans Basel often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Loans Basel needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10008389) -10008389 - -
Year 1 3472280 -6536109 3472280 0.8696 3019374
Year 2 3956231 -2579878 7428511 0.7561 2991479
Year 3 3958266 1378388 11386777 0.6575 2602624
Year 4 3232024 4610412 14618801 0.5718 1847920
TOTAL 10461397


The Net NPV after 4 years is 453008

(10461397 - 10008389 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10008389) -10008389 - -
Year 1 3472280 -6536109 3472280 0.8333 2893567
Year 2 3956231 -2579878 7428511 0.6944 2747383
Year 3 3958266 1378388 11386777 0.5787 2290663
Year 4 3232024 4610412 14618801 0.4823 1558654
TOTAL 9490266


The Net NPV after 4 years is -518123

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9490266 - 10008389 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Loans Basel to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Loans Basel has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Loans Basel can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Loans Basel, then the stock price of the Loans Basel should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Loans Basel should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Basel II: Assessing the Default and Loss Characteristics of Project Finance Loans (A)

References & Further Readings

Benjamin C. Esty, Aldo Sesia (2018), "Basel II: Assessing the Default and Loss Characteristics of Project Finance Loans (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Kangyue Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Fujian Kuncai Material Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Anhui Shanying Paper SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Paper & Paper Products


Suli SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Kobay Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Appliance & Tool


Toyo Tec SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Security Systems & Services


Petro Welt Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Akwel SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts