×




Crowdfunding in Europe: Determinants of Platform Creation across Countries Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Crowdfunding in Europe: Determinants of Platform Creation across Countries case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Crowdfunding in Europe: Determinants of Platform Creation across Countries case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Gary Dushnitsky, Massimiliano Guerini, Evila Piva, Cristina Rossi-Lamastra. The Crowdfunding in Europe: Determinants of Platform Creation across Countries (referred as “Crowdfunding Creation” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Internet.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Crowdfunding in Europe: Determinants of Platform Creation across Countries Case Study


While the crowdfunding phenomenon has attracted considerable practitioner and scholarly attention, existing research predominantly reflects a U.S.-centric perspective. This article examines crowdfunding platform creation in 15 European countries. Despite the omnipresent reach of the internet, national boundaries shape the evolution of the European crowdfunding industry. Specifically, crowdfunding platform creation varies across countries and distinct national patterns emerge for crowdfunding activity in general. Moreover, econometric analyses suggest that country-level factors influence platform creation in European countries, with interesting variations across four crowdfunding models: Donation, Reward, Lending, and Equity.


Case Authors : Gary Dushnitsky, Massimiliano Guerini, Evila Piva, Cristina Rossi-Lamastra

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Internet




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Crowdfunding in Europe: Determinants of Platform Creation across Countries Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021729) -10021729 - -
Year 1 3446717 -6575012 3446717 0.9434 3251620
Year 2 3966074 -2608938 7412791 0.89 3529792
Year 3 3945772 1336834 11358563 0.8396 3312946
Year 4 3226063 4562897 14584626 0.7921 2555344
TOTAL 14584626 12649702




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2627973

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Crowdfunding Creation shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Crowdfunding Creation have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Crowdfunding in Europe: Determinants of Platform Creation across Countries

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Crowdfunding Creation often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Crowdfunding Creation needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021729) -10021729 - -
Year 1 3446717 -6575012 3446717 0.8696 2997145
Year 2 3966074 -2608938 7412791 0.7561 2998922
Year 3 3945772 1336834 11358563 0.6575 2594409
Year 4 3226063 4562897 14584626 0.5718 1844512
TOTAL 10434988


The Net NPV after 4 years is 413259

(10434988 - 10021729 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021729) -10021729 - -
Year 1 3446717 -6575012 3446717 0.8333 2872264
Year 2 3966074 -2608938 7412791 0.6944 2754218
Year 3 3945772 1336834 11358563 0.5787 2283433
Year 4 3226063 4562897 14584626 0.4823 1555779
TOTAL 9465694


The Net NPV after 4 years is -556035

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9465694 - 10021729 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Crowdfunding Creation to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Crowdfunding Creation has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Crowdfunding Creation can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Crowdfunding Creation, then the stock price of the Crowdfunding Creation should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Crowdfunding Creation should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Crowdfunding in Europe: Determinants of Platform Creation across Countries

References & Further Readings

Gary Dushnitsky, Massimiliano Guerini, Evila Piva, Cristina Rossi-Lamastra (2018), "Crowdfunding in Europe: Determinants of Platform Creation across Countries Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Kolonmaterial SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Jamu dan Farmasi Sido SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Jinlongyu A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Belden SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Kahee SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Blackrock B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Enbridge Energy Partners LP SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


iGO Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


SEMAFO Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Geo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Danal SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services