×




Investor Relations at TOTAL Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Investor Relations at TOTAL case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Investor Relations at TOTAL case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Gregory S. Miller, Vincent Dessain, Anders Sjoman. The Investor Relations at TOTAL (referred as “Total Communication” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Corporate communications, Entrepreneurship, Financial management, Financial markets, Marketing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Investor Relations at TOTAL Case Study


Examines investor relations and financial communications in a large company with a diverse group of financial stakeholders. Total is an "energy major" based in Paris, France. The importance of its product and its impact on economies and environments combine with the size of the company to make Total highly visible to investors, governments, environmental groups, and other shareholders. The highly technical nature of Total's many internal activities and the breadth of its complex operations further impacts communication efforts. In addition, as a Continental European firm (in particular, French), Total has strong societal expectations regarding its interactions with employees/citizens vs. shareholders. Examines how Total creates a consistent and clear financial communication that provides information to these diverse stakeholder bases and their different desires for the company. Also asks students to consider how this communication strategy will need adjustment due to a period of high oil prices and a resulting windfall profit during 2005.


Case Authors : Gregory S. Miller, Vincent Dessain, Anders Sjoman

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Corporate communications, Entrepreneurship, Financial management, Financial markets, Marketing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Investor Relations at TOTAL Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000345) -10000345 - -
Year 1 3445938 -6554407 3445938 0.9434 3250885
Year 2 3967553 -2586854 7413491 0.89 3531108
Year 3 3969842 1382988 11383333 0.8396 3333156
Year 4 3235283 4618271 14618616 0.7921 2562647
TOTAL 14618616 12677796




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2677451

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Total Communication have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Total Communication shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Investor Relations at TOTAL

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Total Communication often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Total Communication needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000345) -10000345 - -
Year 1 3445938 -6554407 3445938 0.8696 2996468
Year 2 3967553 -2586854 7413491 0.7561 3000040
Year 3 3969842 1382988 11383333 0.6575 2610236
Year 4 3235283 4618271 14618616 0.5718 1849784
TOTAL 10456527


The Net NPV after 4 years is 456182

(10456527 - 10000345 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000345) -10000345 - -
Year 1 3445938 -6554407 3445938 0.8333 2871615
Year 2 3967553 -2586854 7413491 0.6944 2755245
Year 3 3969842 1382988 11383333 0.5787 2297362
Year 4 3235283 4618271 14618616 0.4823 1560225
TOTAL 9484448


The Net NPV after 4 years is -515897

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9484448 - 10000345 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Total Communication to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Total Communication has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Total Communication can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Total Communication, then the stock price of the Total Communication should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Total Communication should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Investor Relations at TOTAL

References & Further Readings

Gregory S. Miller, Vincent Dessain, Anders Sjoman (2018), "Investor Relations at TOTAL Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Enova International Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Guidewire SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Eyepoint Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Helen of Troy Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Aeroports Paris SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Bomi Italia SpA SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Taya Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Personal Services


Yueyang Forest & Paper SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Paper & Paper Products


Benitec Biopharma Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Recylex SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products