India Faces a Power Failure: U.S. Financial Service Company Expansion Plans Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for India Faces a Power Failure: U.S. Financial Service Company Expansion Plans case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. India Faces a Power Failure: U.S. Financial Service Company Expansion Plans case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by F. John Mathis, Frank Tuzzolino. The India Faces a Power Failure: U.S. Financial Service Company Expansion Plans (referred as “Usfsc India” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial management, International business, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of India Faces a Power Failure: U.S. Financial Service Company Expansion Plans Case Study

The case deals with U.S. Financial Service Company (USFSC) and its CEO, John P. Lewis, and their consideration whether or not the company should open operations in India. USFSC would either partner with a local financial service company or invest in a new start-up bank branch or representative office in India. Although Lewis is conducting this analysis in 2012, the case covers the time period from 2005 to 2012 to provide background and to review the economic developments and political policies undertaken by the Indian government to recover from the global financial crisis of 2007-2009. The case requires a performance analysis of the financial ability of USFSC to undertake expansion into India and/or the case also requires an assessment of the economic and political risks of investing in India and how to mitigate those risks

Case Authors : F. John Mathis, Frank Tuzzolino

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Financial management, International business, Risk management

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for India Faces a Power Failure: U.S. Financial Service Company Expansion Plans Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10015728)	-10015728	-	-
Year 1	3459900	-6555828	3459900	0.9434	3264057
Year 2	3972355	-2583473	7432255	0.89	3535382
Year 3	3973234	1389761	11405489	0.8396	3336004
Year 4	3231994	4621755	14637483	0.7921	2560042
TOTAL			14637483		12695484

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2679756

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Usfsc India shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Usfsc India have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of India Faces a Power Failure: U.S. Financial Service Company Expansion Plans

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Usfsc India often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Usfsc India needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10015728)	-10015728	-	-
Year 1	3459900	-6555828	3459900	0.8696	3008609
Year 2	3972355	-2583473	7432255	0.7561	3003671
Year 3	3973234	1389761	11405489	0.6575	2612466
Year 4	3231994	4621755	14637483	0.5718	1847903
TOTAL					10472649

The Net NPV after 4 years is 456921

(10472649 - 10015728 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10015728)	-10015728	-	-
Year 1	3459900	-6555828	3459900	0.8333	2883250
Year 2	3972355	-2583473	7432255	0.6944	2758580
Year 3	3973234	1389761	11405489	0.5787	2299325
Year 4	3231994	4621755	14637483	0.4823	1558639
TOTAL					9499794

The Net NPV after 4 years is -515934

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9499794 - 10015728 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Usfsc India to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Usfsc India has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Usfsc India can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Usfsc India, then the stock price of the Usfsc India should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Usfsc India should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of India Faces a Power Failure: U.S. Financial Service Company Expansion Plans

References & Further Readings

F. John Mathis, Frank Tuzzolino (2018), "India Faces a Power Failure: U.S. Financial Service Company Expansion Plans Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.