×




Hayman Capital Management Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Hayman Capital Management case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Hayman Capital Management case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Robin Greenwood, Julie Messina, Jared Dourdeville. The Hayman Capital Management (referred as “Hayman Bass” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Business law, Collaboration, Financial management, Marketing, Policy, Pricing, Strategy execution.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Hayman Capital Management Case Study


In late December 2011, Hayman Capital founder and portfolio manager Kyle Bass was reviewing Japanese government budget projections for 2012. The projections appeared contrary to Hayman Capital's views on Japan, where the fund had built a bearish position. Japan had the world's highest debt burden, whether expressed as a percentage of GDP or government revenue. Guided by recent global events, Bass forecast that Japan would soon experience increases in interest rates, a devaluation of the currency, and eventually, a restructuring of the country's debt.


Case Authors : Robin Greenwood, Julie Messina, Jared Dourdeville

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Business law, Collaboration, Financial management, Marketing, Policy, Pricing, Strategy execution




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Hayman Capital Management Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028262) -10028262 - -
Year 1 3471923 -6556339 3471923 0.9434 3275399
Year 2 3965645 -2590694 7437568 0.89 3529410
Year 3 3950655 1359961 11388223 0.8396 3317046
Year 4 3227089 4587050 14615312 0.7921 2556157
TOTAL 14615312 12678012




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2649750

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Hayman Bass shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Hayman Bass have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Hayman Capital Management

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Hayman Bass often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Hayman Bass needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028262) -10028262 - -
Year 1 3471923 -6556339 3471923 0.8696 3019063
Year 2 3965645 -2590694 7437568 0.7561 2998597
Year 3 3950655 1359961 11388223 0.6575 2597620
Year 4 3227089 4587050 14615312 0.5718 1845099
TOTAL 10460379


The Net NPV after 4 years is 432117

(10460379 - 10028262 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028262) -10028262 - -
Year 1 3471923 -6556339 3471923 0.8333 2893269
Year 2 3965645 -2590694 7437568 0.6944 2753920
Year 3 3950655 1359961 11388223 0.5787 2286259
Year 4 3227089 4587050 14615312 0.4823 1556274
TOTAL 9489722


The Net NPV after 4 years is -538540

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9489722 - 10028262 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Hayman Bass to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Hayman Bass has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Hayman Bass can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Hayman Bass, then the stock price of the Hayman Bass should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Hayman Bass should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Hayman Capital Management

References & Further Readings

Robin Greenwood, Julie Messina, Jared Dourdeville (2018), "Hayman Capital Management Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Agro Phos SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Blackrock Commodities SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Shinagawa Refractories SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


Aneka Gas SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Wacom Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Peripherals


Himaraya Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)


Kantone SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Hardware


Artemis Alpha SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Stanley Black Decker SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Appliance & Tool


Selvaag Bolig SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services