×




Corporate Values and Transformation: The Micro lender Compartamos Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Corporate Values and Transformation: The Micro lender Compartamos case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Corporate Values and Transformation: The Micro lender Compartamos case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jonathan Schlefer, Guy Stuart. The Corporate Values and Transformation: The Micro lender Compartamos (referred as “Compartamos Microlenders” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Economy, Entrepreneurial finance, Financial management, Government, International business, Project management, Social enterprise.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Corporate Values and Transformation: The Micro lender Compartamos Case Study


Microlending, defined as very small loans advanced to very low-income entrepreneurs, has attracted wide attention as a potentially effective means to aid the economic development of impoverished nations. This case focuses on one of the largest and most successful of such microlenders, Mexico's Compartamos ("we share") organization, and raises questions about the most effective business model and scale of microlenders. Specifically, the case tells the story of how Compartamos, which had found great success making small loans in villages and rural areas, fared when it sought to expand into Mexico City. A series of reverses--higher default rates, personnel problems, and unexpected competition and regulatory issues--implicitly pose the question of whether Compartamos and microlenders of its type, which historically have relied on peer group pressure to ensure repayment of otherwise unsecured loans to small start-up businesses, can expand and adapt to an urban setting. HKS Case Number 1761.0


Case Authors : Jonathan Schlefer, Guy Stuart

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Economy, Entrepreneurial finance, Financial management, Government, International business, Project management, Social enterprise




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Corporate Values and Transformation: The Micro lender Compartamos Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005379) -10005379 - -
Year 1 3470913 -6534466 3470913 0.9434 3274446
Year 2 3954675 -2579791 7425588 0.89 3519647
Year 3 3972222 1392431 11397810 0.8396 3335154
Year 4 3226619 4619050 14624429 0.7921 2555784
TOTAL 14624429 12685032




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2679653

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Compartamos Microlenders have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Compartamos Microlenders shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Corporate Values and Transformation: The Micro lender Compartamos

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Compartamos Microlenders often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Compartamos Microlenders needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005379) -10005379 - -
Year 1 3470913 -6534466 3470913 0.8696 3018185
Year 2 3954675 -2579791 7425588 0.7561 2990302
Year 3 3972222 1392431 11397810 0.6575 2611800
Year 4 3226619 4619050 14624429 0.5718 1844830
TOTAL 10465118


The Net NPV after 4 years is 459739

(10465118 - 10005379 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005379) -10005379 - -
Year 1 3470913 -6534466 3470913 0.8333 2892428
Year 2 3954675 -2579791 7425588 0.6944 2746302
Year 3 3972222 1392431 11397810 0.5787 2298740
Year 4 3226619 4619050 14624429 0.4823 1556047
TOTAL 9493516


The Net NPV after 4 years is -511863

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9493516 - 10005379 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Compartamos Microlenders to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Compartamos Microlenders has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Compartamos Microlenders can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Compartamos Microlenders, then the stock price of the Compartamos Microlenders should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Compartamos Microlenders should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Corporate Values and Transformation: The Micro lender Compartamos

References & Further Readings

Jonathan Schlefer, Guy Stuart (2018), "Corporate Values and Transformation: The Micro lender Compartamos Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Kirklands SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)


Maruwa Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Defense Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Stcube SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


ISP Global SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Foris Beteiligungs SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Glenveagh Properties SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Mimecast Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming