×




Foreign Exchange Hedging Strategies at General Motors: Transactional and Translational Exposures Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Foreign Exchange Hedging Strategies at General Motors: Transactional and Translational Exposures case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Foreign Exchange Hedging Strategies at General Motors: Transactional and Translational Exposures case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Mihir A. Desai, Mark F. Veblen. The Foreign Exchange Hedging Strategies at General Motors: Transactional and Translational Exposures (referred as “Hedging Exposures” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial management, Financial markets, International business, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Foreign Exchange Hedging Strategies at General Motors: Transactional and Translational Exposures Case Study


How should a multinational firm manage foreign exchange exposures? Examines transactional and translational exposures and alternative responses to these exposures by analyzing two specific hedging decisions by General Motors. Describes General Motors' corporate hedging policies, its risk management structure, and how accounting rules impact hedging decisions. Although the overall corporate hedging policy provides a consistent approach to the foreign exchange risks that General Motors must manage, the company also has to consider deviations from prescribed policies. Describes two such situations: a significant exposure to the Canadian dollar with adverse accounting consequences and GM's exposure to the Argentinean currency when devaluation is widely anticipated. Students must evaluate the risks General Motors faces in each situation and consider which hedging strategy--if any--might be appropriate. Additionally, asks students to analyze the financial costs and accounting treatment of alternative derivative transactions for hedging purposes. A rewritten version of an earlier case.


Case Authors : Mihir A. Desai, Mark F. Veblen

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Financial management, Financial markets, International business, Risk management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Foreign Exchange Hedging Strategies at General Motors: Transactional and Translational Exposures Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009716) -10009716 - -
Year 1 3469633 -6540083 3469633 0.9434 3273239
Year 2 3955584 -2584499 7425217 0.89 3520456
Year 3 3967751 1383252 11392968 0.8396 3331400
Year 4 3245339 4628591 14638307 0.7921 2570612
TOTAL 14638307 12695707




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2685991

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Hedging Exposures shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Hedging Exposures have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Foreign Exchange Hedging Strategies at General Motors: Transactional and Translational Exposures

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Hedging Exposures often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Hedging Exposures needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009716) -10009716 - -
Year 1 3469633 -6540083 3469633 0.8696 3017072
Year 2 3955584 -2584499 7425217 0.7561 2990990
Year 3 3967751 1383252 11392968 0.6575 2608861
Year 4 3245339 4628591 14638307 0.5718 1855533
TOTAL 10472456


The Net NPV after 4 years is 462740

(10472456 - 10009716 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009716) -10009716 - -
Year 1 3469633 -6540083 3469633 0.8333 2891361
Year 2 3955584 -2584499 7425217 0.6944 2746933
Year 3 3967751 1383252 11392968 0.5787 2296152
Year 4 3245339 4628591 14638307 0.4823 1565075
TOTAL 9499521


The Net NPV after 4 years is -510195

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9499521 - 10009716 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Hedging Exposures to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Hedging Exposures has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Hedging Exposures can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Hedging Exposures, then the stock price of the Hedging Exposures should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Hedging Exposures should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Foreign Exchange Hedging Strategies at General Motors: Transactional and Translational Exposures

References & Further Readings

Mihir A. Desai, Mark F. Veblen (2018), "Foreign Exchange Hedging Strategies at General Motors: Transactional and Translational Exposures Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Charles Taylor SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Miscellaneous)


Sachem Capital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Augean SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Waste Management Services


Quaterra Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


J W Mays SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Beston Global Food Company Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Hasegawa Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)


Euroland Corporate SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


United Food Holdings Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Onward Technologies Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming