×




General Motors Corp. (B): Financial Policies Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for General Motors Corp. (B): Financial Policies case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. General Motors Corp. (B): Financial Policies case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Peter Tufano, Markus F. Mullarkey, William J. Wildern. The General Motors Corp. (B): Financial Policies (referred as “Policies Motors” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Costs, Financial markets, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of General Motors Corp. (B): Financial Policies Case Study


The second in a four-part series, the case details the financial policies and practices at General Motors from 1990 to 1996. This part describes the stated financial policies of the firm, including its approach to capital structure, liability structure, equity structure, dividends, cash balances, and risk management.


Case Authors : Peter Tufano, Markus F. Mullarkey, William J. Wildern

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Costs, Financial markets, Risk management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for General Motors Corp. (B): Financial Policies Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016514) -10016514 - -
Year 1 3446308 -6570206 3446308 0.9434 3251234
Year 2 3961551 -2608655 7407859 0.89 3525766
Year 3 3941687 1333032 11349546 0.8396 3309516
Year 4 3228472 4561504 14578018 0.7921 2557252
TOTAL 14578018 12643769




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2627255

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Policies Motors shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Policies Motors have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of General Motors Corp. (B): Financial Policies

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Policies Motors often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Policies Motors needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016514) -10016514 - -
Year 1 3446308 -6570206 3446308 0.8696 2996790
Year 2 3961551 -2608655 7407859 0.7561 2995502
Year 3 3941687 1333032 11349546 0.6575 2591723
Year 4 3228472 4561504 14578018 0.5718 1845889
TOTAL 10429904


The Net NPV after 4 years is 413390

(10429904 - 10016514 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016514) -10016514 - -
Year 1 3446308 -6570206 3446308 0.8333 2871923
Year 2 3961551 -2608655 7407859 0.6944 2751077
Year 3 3941687 1333032 11349546 0.5787 2281069
Year 4 3228472 4561504 14578018 0.4823 1556941
TOTAL 9461010


The Net NPV after 4 years is -555504

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9461010 - 10016514 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Policies Motors to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Policies Motors has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Policies Motors can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Policies Motors, then the stock price of the Policies Motors should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Policies Motors should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of General Motors Corp. (B): Financial Policies

References & Further Readings

Peter Tufano, Markus F. Mullarkey, William J. Wildern (2018), "General Motors Corp. (B): Financial Policies Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


S&T AG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


TECSYS Inc. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Gabelli SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Fuling Global Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Guangdong Piano SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Pradip Overseas Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


PW Medtech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Shanghai Material Trading B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Greenbrook TMS SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities