Accounting for Faulty Ignition Switches at General Motors Company Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Accounting for Faulty Ignition Switches at General Motors Company case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Accounting for Faulty Ignition Switches at General Motors Company case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Darren Henderson, Julia Cutt. The Accounting for Faulty Ignition Switches at General Motors Company (referred as “Recall Ignition” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Crisis management, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Accounting for Faulty Ignition Switches at General Motors Company Case Study

On January 31, 2014, the chief executive officer (CEO) of General Motors (GM), a major automaker located in Detroit, Michigan, must decide whether to issue a recall based on a defect that had been found through an internal safety committee investigation. The ignition switch of certain GM small car models manufactured between 2005 and 2007 was prone to being nudged out of the run position, causing the driver to lose control as the engine would switch off mid-drive, disabling power steering and preventing air bags from being deployed in the case of a collision. If she decided to issue a recall, the CEO needed to consider which car models to include, as well as whether to offer any additional compensation to drivers. Not only would a recall have potential legal and public relations repercussions, but it would present the company with potential future costs. She needed to consider the accounting implications of these contingencies.

Case Authors : Darren Henderson, Julia Cutt

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Crisis management, Risk management

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Accounting for Faulty Ignition Switches at General Motors Company Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10006791)	-10006791	-	-
Year 1	3444706	-6562085	3444706	0.9434	3249723
Year 2	3967928	-2594157	7412634	0.89	3531442
Year 3	3963570	1369413	11376204	0.8396	3327890
Year 4	3231111	4600524	14607315	0.7921	2559343
TOTAL			14607315		12668397

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2661606

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Recall Ignition have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Recall Ignition shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Accounting for Faulty Ignition Switches at General Motors Company

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Recall Ignition often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Recall Ignition needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10006791)	-10006791	-	-
Year 1	3444706	-6562085	3444706	0.8696	2995397
Year 2	3967928	-2594157	7412634	0.7561	3000324
Year 3	3963570	1369413	11376204	0.6575	2606112
Year 4	3231111	4600524	14607315	0.5718	1847398
TOTAL					10449230

The Net NPV after 4 years is 442439

(10449230 - 10006791 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10006791)	-10006791	-	-
Year 1	3444706	-6562085	3444706	0.8333	2870588
Year 2	3967928	-2594157	7412634	0.6944	2755506
Year 3	3963570	1369413	11376204	0.5787	2293733
Year 4	3231111	4600524	14607315	0.4823	1558213
TOTAL					9478040

The Net NPV after 4 years is -528751

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9478040 - 10006791 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Recall Ignition to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Recall Ignition has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Recall Ignition can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Recall Ignition, then the stock price of the Recall Ignition should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Recall Ignition should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Accounting for Faulty Ignition Switches at General Motors Company

References & Further Readings

Darren Henderson, Julia Cutt (2018), "Accounting for Faulty Ignition Switches at General Motors Company Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.