×




Canadian Pacific Ltd: Unlocking Shareholder Value in a Conglomerate Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Canadian Pacific Ltd: Unlocking Shareholder Value in a Conglomerate case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Canadian Pacific Ltd: Unlocking Shareholder Value in a Conglomerate case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Michael R King, Michael Zawalsky. The Canadian Pacific Ltd: Unlocking Shareholder Value in a Conglomerate (referred as “Cpl Conglomerate” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial management, Reorganization.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Canadian Pacific Ltd: Unlocking Shareholder Value in a Conglomerate Case Study


In January 2001, the chief executive officer (CEO) of Canadian Pacific Limited (CPL) was contemplating the future of his firm. CPL was one of Canada's oldest conglomerates with operations in railways, shipping, natural resources and hotels. Its stock market capitalization of CDN$13.5 billion reflected a conglomerate discount, estimated at 12 to 35 per cent of the value. In order to eliminate this conglomerate discount and maximize shareholder value, the CEO weighed the pros and cons of asset divestitures or spinoffs. Would it make sense to keep some of the related business together to preserve economies of scale and scope and to maintain synergies? What would be the tax implications of each option? There were numerous operational and legal implications to consider. Knowing he had to make a decision quickly, the CEO looked for the option that would unlock the most value for CPL's shareholders.


Case Authors : Michael R King, Michael Zawalsky

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Financial management, Reorganization




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Canadian Pacific Ltd: Unlocking Shareholder Value in a Conglomerate Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025812) -10025812 - -
Year 1 3449809 -6576003 3449809 0.9434 3254537
Year 2 3979046 -2596957 7428855 0.89 3541337
Year 3 3962382 1365425 11391237 0.8396 3326892
Year 4 3249133 4614558 14640370 0.7921 2573618
TOTAL 14640370 12696384




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2670572

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Cpl Conglomerate have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Cpl Conglomerate shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Canadian Pacific Ltd: Unlocking Shareholder Value in a Conglomerate

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Cpl Conglomerate often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Cpl Conglomerate needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025812) -10025812 - -
Year 1 3449809 -6576003 3449809 0.8696 2999834
Year 2 3979046 -2596957 7428855 0.7561 3008730
Year 3 3962382 1365425 11391237 0.6575 2605330
Year 4 3249133 4614558 14640370 0.5718 1857702
TOTAL 10471597


The Net NPV after 4 years is 445785

(10471597 - 10025812 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025812) -10025812 - -
Year 1 3449809 -6576003 3449809 0.8333 2874841
Year 2 3979046 -2596957 7428855 0.6944 2763226
Year 3 3962382 1365425 11391237 0.5787 2293045
Year 4 3249133 4614558 14640370 0.4823 1566904
TOTAL 9498017


The Net NPV after 4 years is -527795

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9498017 - 10025812 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Cpl Conglomerate to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Cpl Conglomerate has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Cpl Conglomerate can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Cpl Conglomerate, then the stock price of the Cpl Conglomerate should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Cpl Conglomerate should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Canadian Pacific Ltd: Unlocking Shareholder Value in a Conglomerate

References & Further Readings

Michael R King, Michael Zawalsky (2018), "Canadian Pacific Ltd: Unlocking Shareholder Value in a Conglomerate Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


New Universe Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Waste Management Services


Agatos SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Chengdu Fusen Noble-House SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Comba Telecom Systems SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Protea Biosciences SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Garuda Maintenance Facility SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Great Wall Belt SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services