×




America Online, Inc.: Disclosure Strategy Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for America Online, Inc.: Disclosure Strategy case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. America Online, Inc.: Disclosure Strategy case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Amy P. Hutton, David Lane. The America Online, Inc.: Disclosure Strategy (referred as “Aol's Metrics” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Communication, Disruptive innovation, Entrepreneurship, Financial management, Internet, Marketing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of America Online, Inc.: Disclosure Strategy Case Study


Since going public, AOL had disclosed on a quarterly basis supplemental metrics meant to give analysts and investors a way of tracking growth in its subscriber base and the value created through its marketing efforts. These metrics gave management's conversations with sell-side analysts focus and armed analysts with the evidence they needed to sell AOL's emerging business to leery institutional investors. This case picks up in early 1998 when AOL is transitioning from being an Internet service provider with revenues generated primarily from subscribers to becoming an online media company with a significant proportion of its revenues coming from online advertising and e-commerce. As the company transitioned, management had to decide whether and which supplemental metrics to disclose on a quarterly basis. The challenge was to select metrics that gave the financial community a way of understanding AOL's performance as its business model evolved, without limiting AOL's future flexibility. Teaching Purpose: Provides an opportunity to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of supplemental disclosures as a tool to educate Wall Street about a firm's evolving business model. Withdrawn 08/15/02.


Case Authors : Amy P. Hutton, David Lane

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Communication, Disruptive innovation, Entrepreneurship, Financial management, Internet, Marketing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for America Online, Inc.: Disclosure Strategy Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000577) -10000577 - -
Year 1 3458956 -6541621 3458956 0.9434 3263166
Year 2 3961081 -2580540 7420037 0.89 3525348
Year 3 3954066 1373526 11374103 0.8396 3319910
Year 4 3234484 4608010 14608587 0.7921 2562014
TOTAL 14608587 12670438




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2669861

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Aol's Metrics have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Aol's Metrics shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of America Online, Inc.: Disclosure Strategy

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Aol's Metrics often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Aol's Metrics needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000577) -10000577 - -
Year 1 3458956 -6541621 3458956 0.8696 3007788
Year 2 3961081 -2580540 7420037 0.7561 2995146
Year 3 3954066 1373526 11374103 0.6575 2599863
Year 4 3234484 4608010 14608587 0.5718 1849327
TOTAL 10452123


The Net NPV after 4 years is 451546

(10452123 - 10000577 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000577) -10000577 - -
Year 1 3458956 -6541621 3458956 0.8333 2882463
Year 2 3961081 -2580540 7420037 0.6944 2750751
Year 3 3954066 1373526 11374103 0.5787 2288233
Year 4 3234484 4608010 14608587 0.4823 1559840
TOTAL 9481287


The Net NPV after 4 years is -519290

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9481287 - 10000577 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Aol's Metrics to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Aol's Metrics has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Aol's Metrics can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Aol's Metrics, then the stock price of the Aol's Metrics should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Aol's Metrics should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of America Online, Inc.: Disclosure Strategy

References & Further Readings

Amy P. Hutton, David Lane (2018), "America Online, Inc.: Disclosure Strategy Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Japan Pile Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


Lontrue Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Crops


Northeast Sec A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Escape Hunt SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Casinos & Gaming


Telecom Digital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Technology)


Bell SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


China Health SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


UPP Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Paper & Paper Products