×




When It Takes a Network: Creating Strategy and Agility through Wargaming Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for When It Takes a Network: Creating Strategy and Agility through Wargaming case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. When It Takes a Network: Creating Strategy and Agility through Wargaming case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Arnoud Franken, Harry Thomsett. The When It Takes a Network: Creating Strategy and Agility through Wargaming (referred as “Wargaming Marines” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Networking, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of When It Takes a Network: Creating Strategy and Agility through Wargaming Case Study


Rational, analytical, directed approaches for strategy creation and execution may work for creating value by conventional, hierarchically structured organizations operating in stable environments. However, when the basis of competition shifts from product features to an experience delivered by a network of independently acting participants in a complex and fast-evolving market environment, approaches based on command and control do not work. For order to emerge from such chaos and to gain more control over success, strategy based on reason alone is not enough to inspire action in others. To understand what it takes to effectively make strategy under such circumstances, this article shows how the UK's Royal Marines, in collaboration with more than a dozen different stakeholder groups, developed a novel adaptation of wargaming to affect strategic change in Afghanistan. It also demonstrates the broad applicability of this strategic approach.


Case Authors : Arnoud Franken, Harry Thomsett

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Networking, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for When It Takes a Network: Creating Strategy and Agility through Wargaming Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013772) -10013772 - -
Year 1 3472199 -6541573 3472199 0.9434 3275659
Year 2 3965502 -2576071 7437701 0.89 3529283
Year 3 3967711 1391640 11405412 0.8396 3331367
Year 4 3243413 4635053 14648825 0.7921 2569087
TOTAL 14648825 12705396




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2691624

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Wargaming Marines shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Wargaming Marines have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of When It Takes a Network: Creating Strategy and Agility through Wargaming

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Wargaming Marines often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Wargaming Marines needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013772) -10013772 - -
Year 1 3472199 -6541573 3472199 0.8696 3019303
Year 2 3965502 -2576071 7437701 0.7561 2998489
Year 3 3967711 1391640 11405412 0.6575 2608834
Year 4 3243413 4635053 14648825 0.5718 1854432
TOTAL 10481059


The Net NPV after 4 years is 467287

(10481059 - 10013772 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013772) -10013772 - -
Year 1 3472199 -6541573 3472199 0.8333 2893499
Year 2 3965502 -2576071 7437701 0.6944 2753821
Year 3 3967711 1391640 11405412 0.5787 2296129
Year 4 3243413 4635053 14648825 0.4823 1564146
TOTAL 9507595


The Net NPV after 4 years is -506177

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9507595 - 10013772 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Wargaming Marines to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Wargaming Marines has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Wargaming Marines can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Wargaming Marines, then the stock price of the Wargaming Marines should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Wargaming Marines should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of When It Takes a Network: Creating Strategy and Agility through Wargaming

References & Further Readings

Arnoud Franken, Harry Thomsett (2018), "When It Takes a Network: Creating Strategy and Agility through Wargaming Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Kaiser SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Fiducial Office SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Office Equipment


IMPACT Silver SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


GATX SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Rental & Leasing


Koenig&Bauer AG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Fidia SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods