×




Revenue Flow and Human Rights: A Paradox for Shell Nigeria Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Revenue Flow and Human Rights: A Paradox for Shell Nigeria case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Revenue Flow and Human Rights: A Paradox for Shell Nigeria case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ulrich Steger, Aileen Ionescu-Somers. The Revenue Flow and Human Rights: A Paradox for Shell Nigeria (referred as “Nigerian Eiti” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Social responsibility, Sustainability, Transparency.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Revenue Flow and Human Rights: A Paradox for Shell Nigeria Case Study


The case describes Shell's evolution within the context of sensitive human rights issues related to oil exploration and exploitation in Nigeria. Given that much of the revenue from Nigerian oil resources was being "siphoned" off by corrupt state governors, the case focuses on issues relevant to government transparency and corruption. It describes Shell's involvement in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and its collaboration with the Nigerian Government to instigate a more transparent reporting on oil revenues. However, since two senior Shell executives involved in EITI and negotiations with the government are about to retire from the company, the prospect of briefing their successors on the complexity of the Nigerian situation brings a number of questions that still remain to be answered "to the table". Learning objective: Participants learn about the invasive nature of corruption and its effect on human rights, but more specifically about the role of a multinational versus the role of the government when trying to deal with such issues. Participants will also learn a great deal about the complexity of sustainability issues for corporations, particularly human rights, issues. There is also learning about the scope and limits of corporate responsibility, and the difficulties that all players face in tough market conditions and a on a "non-level playing field". Participants can develop new insights on ways of operating responsibly, creating valuable partnerships and interacting in a global, but socially responsible, context.


Case Authors : Ulrich Steger, Aileen Ionescu-Somers

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Social responsibility, Sustainability, Transparency




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Revenue Flow and Human Rights: A Paradox for Shell Nigeria Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019716) -10019716 - -
Year 1 3451352 -6568364 3451352 0.9434 3255992
Year 2 3960859 -2607505 7412211 0.89 3525150
Year 3 3960756 1353251 11372967 0.8396 3325527
Year 4 3224758 4578009 14597725 0.7921 2554310
TOTAL 14597725 12660980




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2641264

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Nigerian Eiti shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Nigerian Eiti have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Revenue Flow and Human Rights: A Paradox for Shell Nigeria

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Nigerian Eiti often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Nigerian Eiti needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019716) -10019716 - -
Year 1 3451352 -6568364 3451352 0.8696 3001176
Year 2 3960859 -2607505 7412211 0.7561 2994978
Year 3 3960756 1353251 11372967 0.6575 2604261
Year 4 3224758 4578009 14597725 0.5718 1843766
TOTAL 10444181


The Net NPV after 4 years is 424465

(10444181 - 10019716 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019716) -10019716 - -
Year 1 3451352 -6568364 3451352 0.8333 2876127
Year 2 3960859 -2607505 7412211 0.6944 2750597
Year 3 3960756 1353251 11372967 0.5787 2292104
Year 4 3224758 4578009 14597725 0.4823 1555149
TOTAL 9473977


The Net NPV after 4 years is -545739

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9473977 - 10019716 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Nigerian Eiti to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Nigerian Eiti has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Nigerian Eiti can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Nigerian Eiti, then the stock price of the Nigerian Eiti should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Nigerian Eiti should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Revenue Flow and Human Rights: A Paradox for Shell Nigeria

References & Further Readings

Ulrich Steger, Aileen Ionescu-Somers (2018), "Revenue Flow and Human Rights: A Paradox for Shell Nigeria Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Magna Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Butterfly Gandhimathi SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Appliance & Tool


Ford Motor SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


Intel SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Sino-Global SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Skin Elements SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Asiaplast Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


Mogo Finance Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services