×




India's Negotiations Concerning the Dabhol Power Company 2001-2005 Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for India's Negotiations Concerning the Dabhol Power Company 2001-2005 case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. India's Negotiations Concerning the Dabhol Power Company 2001-2005 case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by David W. Conklin, Danielle Cadieux. The India's Negotiations Concerning the Dabhol Power Company 2001-2005 (referred as “Dabhol Enron” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Government.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of India's Negotiations Concerning the Dabhol Power Company 2001-2005 Case Study


In 2001, the Dabhol Power Company (DPC) ceased operations following several years of bitter acrimony between the state of Maharashtra and the foreign owners. GE and Bechtel each owned 10 per cent of the equity, the Maharashtra State Energy Board (MSEB) owned 15 per cent and Enron owned 65 per cent. The Overseas Private Insurance Corporation (OPIC), a U.S. government agency, had lent $138 million and also had provided insurance against "political risk" for some of the other 19 foreign lenders. The lengthy and convoluted experiences of the Enron Dabhol power project are described in detail in Andrew Inkpen's case "Enron and the Dabhol Power Company," Thunderbird Case # A07020008. The purpose of "India's Negotiations Concerning the Dabhol Power Company 2001-2005" is to discuss the negotiation between the various foreign investors and the government of India in an attempt to reactivate the Dabhol project. Ultimately, in 2005 a settlement was negotiated. This case adds a further dimension to the case by Andrew Inkpen, and it can be taught most effectively as a sequel to that case.


Case Authors : David W. Conklin, Danielle Cadieux

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Government




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for India's Negotiations Concerning the Dabhol Power Company 2001-2005 Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017557) -10017557 - -
Year 1 3469298 -6548259 3469298 0.9434 3272923
Year 2 3964721 -2583538 7434019 0.89 3528588
Year 3 3973042 1389504 11407061 0.8396 3335843
Year 4 3224139 4613643 14631200 0.7921 2553820
TOTAL 14631200 12691173




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2673616

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Dabhol Enron shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Dabhol Enron have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of India's Negotiations Concerning the Dabhol Power Company 2001-2005

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Dabhol Enron often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Dabhol Enron needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017557) -10017557 - -
Year 1 3469298 -6548259 3469298 0.8696 3016781
Year 2 3964721 -2583538 7434019 0.7561 2997899
Year 3 3973042 1389504 11407061 0.6575 2612340
Year 4 3224139 4613643 14631200 0.5718 1843412
TOTAL 10470431


The Net NPV after 4 years is 452874

(10470431 - 10017557 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017557) -10017557 - -
Year 1 3469298 -6548259 3469298 0.8333 2891082
Year 2 3964721 -2583538 7434019 0.6944 2753278
Year 3 3973042 1389504 11407061 0.5787 2299214
Year 4 3224139 4613643 14631200 0.4823 1554851
TOTAL 9498425


The Net NPV after 4 years is -519132

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9498425 - 10017557 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Dabhol Enron to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Dabhol Enron has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Dabhol Enron can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Dabhol Enron, then the stock price of the Dabhol Enron should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Dabhol Enron should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of India's Negotiations Concerning the Dabhol Power Company 2001-2005

References & Further Readings

David W. Conklin, Danielle Cadieux (2018), "India's Negotiations Concerning the Dabhol Power Company 2001-2005 Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Neovacs SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Blue Capital Reinsurance SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


EKF Diagnostics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


Kyung Bong SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Nippon Kayaku SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


ClearOne SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Fin. Etang Berre SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Oncard International Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Stepan SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


O.R.T. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming